The youth is an age group.
Another more dynamic approach is the sociological approach based on a theory of the cycles of existence. This approach is that developed and studied since about fifty years in the Anglo-Saxon countries and in Quebec. The youth seen under this angle is a time of transition, of passage marked by locatable stages leading to “the adulthood”. This approach is included and developed in the years 1990 per Olivier Galland, who refers as regards sociology of youth in France. It distinguishes four successive phases thus: end of the studies, the departure of the family home, insertion in the job market, formation of a couple; each individual bringing into play these various phases according to its free will. The various moments mark the realization of various independences. The limit of these models is that they are based on a reference which is “the adulthood”, which is not linear but unstable, flexible, fact of outward journeys and returns. The evolution of the insertion of the young people in the Western companies brings a questioning: the supposed stages to mark out the entry in the adult life are not also any more clear.
A third approach taking account at the same time of the desynchronization of the phases of insertion and the nuances brought to a fixed notion of the adulthood is the processual approach. The time of youth is then put in prospect compared to the process of autonomisation on the one hand from the point of view of insertion, on the other hand from the point of view of the chain of the generations. From this point of view the components of youth are made socializations, of construction of identities, autonomisation but also of générationnelles inscriptions. This step in term of process gums the terminals and the stages with the profit of concepts of flow and dynamics. The experimentation appears the channel by which the young people are integrated into the company and become citizens. By bracket, this approach singularly calls into question the policies turned towards a youth limited arbitrarily by ages, and pleads for a recasting of the actions based on the analysis of the processes and the social reports/ratios. The bursting and the diversity of the situations of the young people bring a major interrogation. Can one still speak to speak about youth? Such an approach means that there exists a series of common denominators, crystallizing elements making it possible to distinguish clearly like groups social “youth”. However we are opposite the report of attitudes and increasingly individualized youthful behaviors, with an obliteration of the terminal-borders delimiting youth as a specific group. While seeking to operate a sorting according to logics of identification and distinction, the result is to burst the homogeneous group youth to lead on youths, made up of heterogeneous sub-groups: young people of the suburbs, young workers, students… It is the dissolution of the categories it and youth (S). Individualization is dynamic and unstable, it is related to effects of age, sex or class and can vary for the same individual according to the moment. In this fluctuating context it becomes difficult to carry out regroupings and to assign to the individuals categories. Force is to note that with this individualization of the courses a new entity " emerges; jeunes" , which comes to replace the exceeded model which is " the jeunesse".
| Random links: | Varâha | Valley-of-the-Gatineau | Canton of Montpellier-8 | Danny world champion | Line of Maurienne |