Value of the distinction
According to the comparison of the pieces of furniture and buildings, one realizes that the writers of the civil code one attached a greatter importance to the buildings than with the pieces of furniture. that is due to a double reason. First of all with the infleuce of the physiocratic theories and then with the proverb of the old Right " LMBO mobilis, LMBO vilis ". one can criticize this system because a long time ago that the physiocratic theories passed from mode and because it should be noticed that in the old Right much of intangible goods (offices, revenues, goodwills) were real that the Civil code did not preserve to them. In addition, the increase in movable fortune at the xix century, especially in the form of transferable securities (actions, obligations, government stocks) obliged the legislator to modify the rules of the Civil code on many points. Thus it was necessary to organize special measures of protection for movable fortune in particular with regard to the flight or the loss of bearer bonds and the alienation of the transferable securities belonging to the minors and to the interdicts.
| Random links: | Business Topaz | Colebrook (Connecticut) | Eugene Levy | County of Belmont | Meliorchis caribea | Robert_Cairncross |