Transporte en Eslovaquia
The point of view of of an individual is the position which it expresses on a subject. For example, to say “the flower is yellow”, means that somebody observed something, identified it with a “flower”, whatever the type of flower, compared it in the spectrum of color with “yellow” and decided that the color was sufficiently close to “yellow” to use the word “is” to describe the relation between the flower and its color. The whole of these decisions leads to the expressed point of view.
Generally, the point of view can be described as being expressed:
- with the first nobody: “ I see that the flower is yellow, I decide to gather it. ”;
- with the second nobody: “ You known as that the flower is yellow? Can I believe you? ”;
- with the third nobody: “ Guillaume and Marcel says that the flower is yellow. ”
A neutral point of view indicates the search for an objective third like source of expression from a point of view. It is a question of allotting all the observations and decision makings constitutive from a point of view to a third nobody, physical or moral. That is often carried out according to the following model: “B in connection with C said”, where cheek the role of the objective third has, bringing a clear distance between the point of view expressed (B) and the speaker stating this relation between has, B and C. This way of doing introduces the problem of the value of the speech, of the choice of the objective third, problem which does not exist when the expression from a point of view is direct. That often requires to call upon professionalism, with the Autorité S on the matter, to rest on the Réputation S (e.g. “the professor has developed in its thesis the opinion B on the scientific sight of the problems C”)… Without a vast groundwork of agreements, which constitute in themselves a oblique systematic, it is possible no to adhere to this neutral point of view and some will not hold account of it, criticizing its Partialité.
The natural Point of view, just like in the idea of the Natural law, is often the result of the choice of a particular science, such as the Physique of the particles, the ecology or the economy as expressed in Biologie (the chains tropics…) and the fact of deciding that all reality can result from this and thus be evaluated. The Buddhism and the Taoïsme idealize this approach, but admit that it is difficult, even impossible to reach, and definitively impossible to communicate with another human being while being sure to include itself/understand.
The multiple Point of view is a Compromis, but requires what is often called (with scorn) “of the policy as usual”: the separation of the participants in factions, at least to agree on a Vocabulary, a label of behavior and a common minimum of Moral and ethical.
See too
| Random links: | Montgomery Clift | Province of Rovigo | Ethernet gigabit | Saint-Vincent-of-Lorouër | Sight & Sound |