The site of Sellafield is the principal complex of the nuclear die British. Initially named “ Windscale ”, it was renamed Sellafield following a serious accident in one of its nuclear plants. Located on the coast of the Irish Sea in the county of Cumbrie at the North-West of the England, it includes/understands today 400 buildings distributed out of 10 km ² and employs approximately 10000 people. This site shelters several factories:
Contrary to the first American engines of Hanford moderated with the Graphite and cooled by water, the Windscale piles are made of a metal uranium heart moderated with the graphite and cooled by air. Each engine contains practically 2000 tons of graphite.
A fire in 1957 involves their closing.
See also: Nuclear plant of Calder Hall/Sellafield
It is impossible to determine with precision the quantities of stored matters, the algae developing in water make very difficult the visual monitoring of the basin and the British authorities could not provide precise accounting to the inspectors of Euratom. The European commission consequently continued Great Britain before the European Court of justice. There would be approximately 1,3 tons of plutonium, including 400 kg in the form of mud at the bottom.
It would also contain waste coming from the Japanese nuclear plant Tokai Walled.
This unit is the greatest concern of the British Autorité of nuclear dismantling in Great Britain, because of sound very important radiation level. Radiations are so important by place which it is not possible for a person to remain there more than two minutes, from where the difficulty of its dismantling or its control. The basin is not even tight, time fissuring the concrete and the cold the contractor, making it possible radioactive water to escape. What is worth to him the nickname of Dirty thirty , " salt trente" in English.
It is conceived to reprocess British but so foreign fuels. The selected process is not the same one as for B205,
After this accident, Windscale is débaptisé and becomes Sellafield.
The investigation showed that probably made 9 months that the escape had started: an inconsistency between the quantity and the weight of matter entering and outgoing of the system of treatment having been noted for the first time in August 2004, but was not transmitted to the suitable manager. Thereafter, the increase in the Temperature and the discovery of radioactive Liquide in the Puisard indicated also a problem, but that was ignored. Épanchement was formally detected only after another To that the which suggested that matter missed, leading the operators at the end of a few days to send a Caméra Robot ized on the defective drain in order to measure the Volume liquid in the sump.
Factory THORP was closed until July 2007 when one of the tanks was given in service, with recommendations of the authority of safety. A ratio of 28 pages was published and put on line, concluding the investigation required by the British authority of safety (HSE/ND). The responsible managers were sanctioned. An internal audit was made by the company BNFL which pled guilty at the time of its lawsuit and has to pay three imposed fines on October 16th, 2006 by the royal court of Carlisle, for non-observance of three authorizations respectively relating to the “Sûreté, the mechanisms, apparatuses and circuits”, the “effective instructions” and the “escapes and losses of radioactive materials or radioactive waste” (either on the whole 500.000 £ of fines more approximately 68.000 £ of procedures).
Quelques 19 ton S of Uranium and 160 Kilogram S of Plutonium (on 200 kg according to the IRSN) dissolved in nitric Acid were pumped sump in a tank out of the closed factory from now on of Thorp. The radiation levels in the tank prevents very entered of human and the repair of the escape by a robot would be too difficult. The persons in charge plan a diversion in order to avoid the tank to continue the exploitation. According to the owner level of criticality could not have been reached during time when the solution was presents to the bottom of the building sheltering the tanks.
According to the French experts of IRSN, it seems that a " excess of confiance" in the design of the factory and that a culture of insufficient safety are at the origin of these défaillances." They classified this accident with the “ level 3 ” of the scale INNATE. French side, following this experience feedback and to two " losses of étanchéité" occurred in 1997 in ex-factory UP2-400 and in 2001 in its factory UP2-800, AREVA has to update in its factory of La Hague (factories UP3 and UP2-800) its procedures of safety. As private individuals of the periodic visual monitorings will be made to avoid the risk of the escapes of radioactive material pulverulent, or liquid and likely to crystallize or evaporate because of a strong ventilation, a wall or a hot substrate or a rather vast surface of spreading out so that the solution can evaporate; these types of escapes not being necessarily detected by the systems located in bottom of léchefritte or sump. In October 2007, the INRS specified that means of video monitoring and measuring devices neutronics were added to the existing device.
See also: Nuclear plant of Calder Hall/Sellafield, List of the nuclear reactors
| Random links: | Bolitoglossa | Charter of the Atlantic | Notoglanidium | Manon Kirouac | Article 70 of the Constitution of the fifth French Republic |