Richard Cobden

Richard Cobden (1804 - 1865) was at the same time a British industrialist and a radical and liberal statesman, associated with John Bright in the development of the Anti-Corn Law League.

First years

Cobden was born in a farm called Dunford, in Heyshott close to Midhurst, in the Sussex. Its family lived this place since many generations, working partly in the trade and partly in agriculture. His/her grandfather had the Mill of Bex with Heyshott and was an energetic and prosperous maltor who exerted the functions of usher and first magistrate of the city, while dealing with rather most of the businesses of the county. His/her father, renonçant at malt factory, limited himself to agriculture. Not very gifted for the businesses, it died while Richard was still child.

The family returned in Midhurst where Cobden attended a Dame School then the school of Bowes Hall to Teesdale in the Yorkshire. At fifteen years it went to work in London in a warehouse directed by his uncle, Richard Ware Cole, where he became sales representative for the muslin and the banner. His/her uncle, noticing the passion of his nephew for the studies, clearly warned it against this taste, which could only harm seriously its success in the commercial life. Cobden was discouraged and but could benefit a good from the library of the London Institution. When his/her uncle went bankrupt, it entered to the company Partridge & Price, in Eastcheap, of which one of the partners had formerly worked with his uncle.

In 1828, Cobden assembled its own business with Sheriff and Waistcoat, partially with the capital of John Lewis; they worked as agents in London for Fort Brothers, printers of banner with Manchester. In 1831, the partners sought to rent one of the factories of the Fort with Sabden, close to Clitheroe. Although Cobden and its associates did not have between them a sufficient Capital, they made on the Fort company such an impression that she agree to on their premises invest a big part of her Equities. The new business thrived and had soon three establishments: Sabden, where was printing works, and from the sales outlets in London and Manchester. The second was directed directly by Cobden, which, in 1832, started what was to be a long association with the city. The success of this company was decisive and fast and “the impression of Cobden” was soon famous for its quality.

If Cobden had devoted all its forces to the businesses, it would have become very rich soon. Its annual benefit was in general of £8,000 with £10,000. However, the practice to inform themselves and to get information had been enracinée in him and it absorbed most of its time. Under the Libra pseudonym it published in the Manchester Times of many letters where it discussed the commercial and economic questions.

First publications

In 1835 it made appear its first booklet, England, Ireland and America, by a manufacturer of Manchester . Cobden recommended to it the principles of peace, non-intervention, reduction of the expenditure and Libre-échange to which its fidelity was absolute. He visited the the United States, unloading with New York on June 7th, 1835. He devoted approximately three months to this voyage, while passing quickly by the States of the littoral and the portion close to the Canada and by collecting there all with length masses of information relating to the state of the country, his resources and his possibilities. Another work appeared towards the end of 1836 pennies the title of La Russia . Its intention was to fight a violent push of Russophobie inspired by David Urquhart. One found there also a committal for daring trial of all the system of foreign politics, founded on the idea of balance of power and need for protecting the trade.

Its bad health obliged it to leave England and during several months, at the end of 1836 and of the beginning of 1837, he travelled in Spain, Turkey and Egypt. During its visit in Egypt it had an interview with Mehemet Ali, which one said a reforming sovereign but whose it did not carry a very favorable impression. It returned to England in April 1837.

First steps in policy

Cobden became soon an important character in the political life and intellectual of Manchester. He fought for the creation of the Athenaeum of Manchester and made the inaugural speech. He was member of the chamber of commerce and took part in the countryside for the creation of a great urban community, of which he was one of the first elected advisers. He also started to be interested highly in the cause of the popular education. Some of its first public speeches took place in meetings which it had organized at Manchester, Salford, Bolton, Rochdale and other close cities, to recommend the creation of schools in Great Britain. It is at the time of a voyage which it to this end made in Rochdale that it became acquainted with John Bright. In 1837, the death of Guillaume IV and the advent of the queen Victoria caused general elections. Cobden was candidate for Stockport, but was beaten little.

Corn Laws

In 1838, an association was constituted in Manchester to fight the Corn Laws and, on its suggestion, it was constituted thereafter on the national plan under the name of Anti-Corn Law League . During the seven years which the league lasted, Cobden was its principal spokesperson and his large inspirer. It was not afraid to face the agricultural great landowners in person or to face the Chartistes, led by Feargus O' Connor.

In 1841, to sir Robert Peel having reversed the Melbourne ministry at the Parliament, there were general elections: Cobden became appointed of Stockport. Its adversaries predicted with confidence that it would not be with the height in the House of Commons. It did not wait a long time after its admission to put to the test their predictions. The Parliament meets on August 19th. The 24, during the discussion on the Discours of the Queen, Cobden made its first speech. “On remarqua, written Harriet Martineau in its Histoire of Paix, que his/her colleagues had not treated it with the Parliament with the courtesy generally of use when it was about a novel member, and one noticed that he did not need these regards. ” Without letting itself discourage, it presented a simple and energetic exposure of its position on the Corn Laws. That was the beginning of its reputation as a Master in the presentation of the ideas.

The Cobden February 17th, 1843 launched an attack against Peel, which he regarded as person in charge of the miserable situation of the workmen of the country. Peel did not answer in the discussion but the speech had been made at one time when the political tensions were extreme. Edward Drummond, secretary private of Peel, recently had been confused with the Prime Minister and had been assassinated in the street. It was the work of a demented person, but as of the evening Peel referred to the tone violent and impassioned speech, regarding it as an incentive with violences against its person. Party of Peel jumped on occasion and excitation there was with its roof so that, when Cobden tried to explain why he intended to criticize only the public figure and not the individual, he was not able to be made hear.

Peel started by “rejecting completely and explicitly the charge which had been made in heat of the discussion and following a false impression”; but it was at the end of the day impressed by the arguments of Cobden, at the price of a scission in its own party. The abrogation of the Corn Laws passed to the House of Commons on May 16th, 1846 with only 98 votes of majority.

Homage and stay abroad

Cobden had sacrificed to this countryside its businesses, its comfort and for some time its health. His/her friends thus estimated that the nation owed him a substantial tribute of gratitude and admiration for these sacrifices. A public Souscription brought back the sum of £80,000. If it had been equipped with personal ambition, it could be committed in the political life with the prospect reaching the higher station. Lord John Russell which, shortly after the abrogation of Corn Laws, had succeeded Peel like Prime Minister, invited Cobden to take part in his government but it declined the invitation.

Cobden had hoped to remake its forces while being devoted a little to itself abroad but its glory had been spread in all the Europe and the radical movement carried it to the naked ones. In July 1846, he wrote with a friend: “Je will speak to you about a project which has just been born in my brain. I gave up any idea to go to bury me in Egypt or Italy. I continue my voyage while making my propaganda campaign through the continent européen”. It referred to the invitations that it had received France, of Prussia, of Austria, Russia and of Spain and it added: “C' is well, with the assistance of God during the twelve months which comes, I will visit all the great States of Europe, I will see their sovereigns or their statesmen and I will make all my possible to make them admit these truths which ended up carrying it in my country. Why should I rust in the inactivity? If the public spirit of my compatriots gives me the means of travelling like their delegate, I will be the first ambassador of the people of this country sent to the nations of the continent. I am pushed there by this kind of instinctive emotion which misled me forever. I hope that I will manage to find, to force the nations Protectionnistes of Europe to adopt a freer system, better means still than those which I could employ to destroy our system of protection.

He visited successively the France, the Spain, the Italy, the Germany and the Russia and everywhere was honoured. It did not accept that the acclamations of the public but the principal statesmen granted several particular audiences to him. During its absence took place of the general elections and he was elected (1847) for Stockport and the West Riding of the Yorkshire. He chooses to represent this last.

Propagandist of peace

Returned from abroad, Cobden was occupied of what seemed to him the logical complement of Libre-échange, namely defense of peace and the reduction of the naval and military armaments. Its horror of war was visceral and, actually, its campaigns against the Corn Laws had been justified by its conviction that the Libre-échange worked strongly in favor of peace and against the war. It was deliberately exposed to the risk to be ridiculous and to be seen reproaching its Utopie. In 1849, it presented to the Parlement a proposal in favor of the International arbitration and, in 1851, a motion for a reciprocal reduction of the armaments. Neither in a case nor in the other it succeeds and did not expect to succeed. Working towards the same end, it was implied in a series of congress of the peace which, of 1848 to 1851, was held successively with Brussels, Paris, Frankfurt, London, Manchester and Edinburgh.

With the introduction of the Second Empire in France, in 1851-1852, a violent panic shook the public, supplied with the press. One appeared that Louis-Napoleon Bonaparte was preparing a sudden forwarding on the English coast the made-to-order of the pirates, without pretext nor provocation. By a series of speech and booklets, at the Parliament and out of the Parliament, Cobden sought to alleviate passions of its compatriots. This attitude made him lose great popularity that it had gained like champion of free trade and it became for a time the man more insulted of England.

However, in consequence of the quarrel on the religious establishments in Palestine, which set ablaze Is of Europe, the Public opinion was metamorphosed suddenly and all the suspicions and all the hatred which one held for the Empereur of the French turned the emperor of Russia now. Louis-Napoleon was regarded as the faithful ally of England and the popular excitation of the nation was swept in the Crimean War.

Being opposed again to the feelings of the public, Cobden, which had travelled in Turkey and had studied its policy, did not see why one wanted to maintain the independence and the integrity of the Ottoman Empire. He considered that it was impossible to maintain it and besides that it was not desirable. “Vous owe réfléchir, says it to the House of Commons, comme of judicious and energetic people to this question: what do you have to make with the Christian population? because Mahométisme]] cannot be maintained and I should be sorry to see our country fighting for the maintenance of Mahométisme… You can keep the Turkey on the chart of the Europe, you can call the country by the name of Turkey if you prefer, but do not believe that you can maintain the law of Mahométans in the pays.” the popular torrent of feeling which involved with the war was however irresistible, and Cobden and Brillant were trailed in mud.

Second war of opium

At the beginning of 1857 one learned in England that the British Plénipotentiaire in this country had broken with the governor of the province of Canton following the Incident of Arrow, following what the English fleet had destroyed thestrong ones on rivers, had burned 23 ships belonging to the Chinese navy and had bombarded the town of Canton. After an attentive study of the official documents, Cobden convainquit that these procedures were completely iniquitous and it submitted to the Parliament a motion in this direction; the discussion was long and memorable and occupied more than four nights, during which it was supported by Sidney Herbert, to sir James Graham, Guillaume Gladstone, Lord John Russell and Benjamin Disraeli. In conclusion Lord Palmerston was beaten by a majority of sixteen votes.

But this triumph cost Cobden its place at the Parliament. After the dissolution, which followed the failure of Lord Palmerston, Cobden was presented in the form of a candidate to Huddersfield, but the voters of this city gave the preference to its adversary, which had supported the war against Russia and had approved what had been done in Canton. Cobden was thus returned to the private life and passing its retirement in its country house of Dunford, it devoted its time without regret to the exploitation of its grounds and the breeding of the pigs.

It benefitted from these leisures to visit the the United States once again. During its absence took place the general elections of 1859 and he was elected without difficulty appointed of Rochdale. Lord Palmerston, again Prime Minister, having discovered that the left wing of the liberal party “had not been as easily crushed” as it had discounted it, made openings of reconciliation and invited Cobden and Thomas Milner Gibson with becoming members of his government. In a sincere and cordial letter, which was given to Cobden at his place with Liverpool, Lord Palmerston offered the Presidency of the Chamber of commerce to him, with a place in his Cabinet. Many of his/her friends insisted near him so that it accepted, but without hesitating only one moment it solved to decline the honor suggested. On its arrival with London it returned visit to Lord Palmerston and with the greatest frankness says to him that in public it had been opposed to him and had denounced it too often, that their sights always diverged very largely, especially on the questions of Politics foreign, so that it could not, without making violence with his own direction of the duty and its integrity, to be useful in his cabinet as minister. Lord Palmerston tried on a pleasant tone to fight such objections, but without success.

But, although he had refused to share the governmental responsibility with Lord Palmerston, it was ready to act like its representative to promote freer commercial relations between France and England. It is him besides, with Brillant and Michel Chevalier, which was at the origin of these negotiations. Towards the end of 1859 it informed with Lord Palmerston, Lord John Russell and Gladstone of its wish to visit France and to enter under discussion with Napoleon III and its ministers, in the intention promoting the freedom of the exchanges. The British statesmen gave him approximately their approval, but it is of its own boss that it went to France, without to have received at the beginning of official Mandat. On its arrival with Paris it had a long audience with Napoleon III, and presented many arguments to him so that one removed the obstacles which had prevented the two countries from being more closely related one to the other, and it succeeds in making a considerable impression on its spirit in favor of free trade. It could discuss then with French ministers and had many serious conversations, especially with Eugene Rouher, which it found laid out well towards the economic and commercial principles that itself recommended. After much of time spent in these preliminary and semi-official negotiations sounded the hour of the diplomacy with the question of a Commercial treaty between the two countries, Cobden was then requested by the British government to act like its plenipotentiary in this question, in.liaison.with Henry Wellesley, first count Cowley, the Ambassadeur in France. But that appeared a very long and hard company. It was necessary to overcome the savage hostility of the French protectionists, which brought much indecision in the emperor and his ministers. There were also delays, hesitations and interior points of detail, which were even more unexplainable.

It was, moreover, attacked with an extreme violence by a powerful fraction of the British press, while the great number of small details of which it was to discuss about the customs Taxes between France and England were a kind of tax on its patience and its zeal which would have discouraged a man less solved. But there was a larger source of embarrassment still than all the remainder. The principal reason which had pushed it to be devoted to this company was its desire impassioned to establish friendlier relations between England and France and to dissipate these feelings of reciprocal jealousy and mistrust which so often appeared and compromised peace between the two countries. It was the most powerful argument and most effective with which it had decided the emperor and the members of the French government. But to the right in the middle of the negotiations, Lord Palmerston presented to the House of Commons measurements to reinforce the naval arsenals of England and it did it in a quarrelsome speech, openly directed against France, which it regarded as a potential invader against which it was necessary to be protected. Such a speech produced with Paris irritation and resentment and without the influence that Cobden had acquired and the perfect confidence which there was in his sincerity, the negotiations probably would have been irremediably wasted. Finally, however, after a ceaseless work of almost twelve months, the work was completed in November 1860.

After the end of this work the two countries which had benefitted so much from it proposed honors with Cobden. Lord Palmerston offered a title of baronnet to him and a place with the Private Council and the emperor of the French would have readily conferred another mark of honor to him. But with its satisfying and its modesty characteristics such rewards made him decline.

The efforts of Cobden in its Propagande for the Libre-échange were always subordinated to the moral goals which he considered highest: the promotion of peace on the ground and the good will among the men. It was its desire and its hope as for the commercial treaty with France. It thus deeply was disappointed and upset to find the old feeling of mistrust always actively supplied with the press and some of the principal politicians of the country. In 1862 it published its booklet entitled Les Three Paniques, of which the goal was to recall the history and to expose the madness of these periodic demonstrations of concern as for the French intentions, of which England had been captive during the fifteen or sixteen years previous.

American Civil War

When the Civil war threatened to burst with the the United States, Cobden was deeply upset. But after the conflict had become inevitable its sympathies went entirely to North, because the South fought to maintain slavery. Its great concern, however, was that the British nation was not devoted to a control unworthy during time of the conflict. And when the relations with the America became critical, even menaçantes, following the encroachments made on the American trade by vessels concerned with the British ports, it posed the problem in front of the House of Commons in a series of exceptional speeches by their force and their clearness.

For several years Cobden had suffered by intervals from a severe irritation from the bronchi and had difficulty in breathe. For this reason it had spent the winter 1860 in Algérie and, each winter which followed, there had to be very careful and to remain confined at his place, especially when time was wet and misty. In November 1864 it went to Rochdale and made in front of its voters a speech which was to be the last of its life. This effort was followed of a great physical prostration and it solved not to leave its retirement of Midhurst until the arrival of spring. But in March took place of the discussions to the House of Commons on the alleged one required to build with the Canada great work of defense. Scandalized by the madness of such a project it was taken of an irresistible desire to go up to London to make known its feelings on the subject. It left at his place on March 21st and was victim of a cold chill. It is restored a little a few days after its arrival in London; but the 29 it had a relapse and on April 2nd, 1865 it expired peacefully in its apartment of Suffolk Street.

Its more important Discours was joined together, London, 1850.

See also

Partial sources


Random links:Constant of dissociation | Peter Fermín | Deposit (data-processing) | Minto Aizawa | Name of Grevena | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H2 | Nigel_Kneale