radical Unité was an political organization created in June 1998 by the alliance of the Groupe union defense (GUD), of Jeune Resistance and the Union of the circles resistance. Alliance that quickly joined of the executives and leader dissenting of the French Œuvre like Thierry Maillard, or of PNFE. Those criticize the inaction, the folklorism and the passeism of their ex-organizations.
The goal of this alliance was to structure the radical tendency and extra-member of Parliament of the extreme right-hand side in France. The group had two press agencies: Resistance! and Young resistance , an Internet site unite-radicale.com and especially an important production of stickers covering the subjects in a way considered to be very provocative.
In 1999, after the crisis of the National front, radical Unité brought a total support, although critical, with Bruno Mégret and the creation of the National republican movement.
Gradually, two political lines clashed within radical Unité: one purely nationalist-revolutionist animated by his secretary-general Christian Bouchet and its secretary-general associates Sebastien Legentil; the other, represented by executives of the south-east of France like Fabrice Robert, Philippe Vardon and Richard Roudier, asserting theses of Guillaume Faye.
That involved a crisis of the movement which lasted all first half of the year 2002. Eddy Marsan, one of the regional advisers of the movement, left it in first to join the National front. Christian Bouchet left to him radical Unité in April to contribute to found the radical Réseau at the end of June. With the new direction of the movement then clashed partisans of the creation of a new structure and others wanting to integrate the National front.
The executives and militants of radical Unit dispersed, joining the radical Network like Lionel Placet, Herve Ryssen and Pierre-Marie Diberder, or creating new organizations like the identity Block (created by Fabrice Robert, Philippe Vardon, Richard Roudier, José-Marie Santamaria and Guillaume Luyt).
radical Unité was member of the European Front of release. This one, which was present in ten European countries, was the heir to the preceding experiments transeuropéennes which were the first European Front of release of Francis Parker Yockey, the European Popular movement of Otto Strasser and Jeune Europe of Jean Thiriart. Radical unit also took part in a called international structure " League coordination of the nationalists-révolutionnaires".
The strategy of the organization was thus defined:
radical Unité asserted broad ideological and historical filiations, affirming in particular:
“Even if it has deeper roots, one can estimate that our political current appears in France at the time of the Revolution in the radical patriotic mediums, and that it is concretized in second half of the XIXe century with ideological fusion of the nationalist currents and Socialist-revolutionists. Consequently, we are the heirs to arm-naked to 1793, Blanqui and Proudhon, of Barrès, the Rosette and the Cercle Proudhon. But also of the “nonconformists of the Thirties” and Valois, as well as other European experiments like the hedillism and the ramirism in Spain, futurism and proclamations of Vérone and the Holy Sepulchre in Italy, as well as preserving Revolution German in its diversity. In France, our current was incarnated - in a more or less perfect way - since the beginning of the Sixties in organizations like the " General federation of the students européens" , " Young Europe " , the organization " Fight of the peuple" , " Partisans européens" , les" Groups action youth " , the " revolutionary Nationalist movement " , " Third way " and " New resistance ". One will be aware, in addition, that our doctrinal current is universal and is found in various forms, in almost all the foreign countries. The most known examples being Argentina with the Arab peronism and countries with the Nassérisme and the Baath sism”
Defining “its principal enemies”, radical Unité wrote:
“Our enemy, it is the Western system. This one is the resultant of an ideological homogenization at the planetary level. The values of the commercial company, the liberal democracy and the middle-class spirit became the only reference at the same time political, ethical and cultural world. There is not a " leader inconnu" or " a hidden hand which dirige" but of the castes leading political, economic, religious, media, who defend the same ideological concepts, bases of their domination. These concepts are in addition accepted (in a variable way according to the level of economic development of the countries) by a very broad part of the populations, that either in a conscious way, or because of influence of the farmhouses media. If the first manifestations of the commercial and middle-class ideology go back to the Middle Ages, and become extensive with the middle-class revolutions English and French, and with the declaration of American independence, the total victory of the system is however recent. It is the fact of the progressive colonization of the whole of planet by the interests Yankees. A sometimes military, but generally cultural colonization which in this case is multiform: sects néo-Protestant women, cultural products conveying the Western ideology (film, data base, cartoons, fast foods, etc), elites of the Third world formed in the universities of the Occident and acquired of this fact to its values and its way of life, etc the sudden collapse of the communist bloc notably reinforced the power of the Western system which is now the only possible model. As vectors of the system all the international structures must be regarded (UNO, the IMF, Interpol, NATO, for example), all the multinational corporations, all the governments of the Great Occident and all their lackeys (including the political parties)… Moreover, it is necessary to be aware that the great force of this system rests on its infinite capacity to recover its adversaries. The possibility of emoluments involves the natural reclassification of some (ex-maos of the Rotary drill, for example), the others see their combat channeled in political ghettos where they gather revolted, playing thus at the same time a part of valve of safety and reserve of agitators and scarecrows (such is the sad fate of the near total of the bunches of right-hand side or left, which one aims so that the forces are destroyed thanks to the opposition of the extremists! …) ”
The organization defined its “main allies thus”:
“We know that we do not have the exclusiveness in the opposition to the system and we recognize well readily the presence in different sectors, but whose interests converge, other radical or more moderate forces of opposition: national movements with character electoralists, movements regionalistic or separatists, environmentalists and ecologists not-rejoined with the system, socialist patriots, militant ethnists, etc the objective of the executives and militants of radical Unit must be in all the circumstances to take care of the specific constitution of faces (circumstantial) plain anti-system which incarnate in the fight the possibility of union of the true opponents to the system. This will frontist must go hand in hand with a denunciation without truce of all the formations reformists which aim at moderating the fights or to recover them for the good of the system. ”
This ideology was abandoned upon the departure of the national-revolutionists of Unit radical and replaced by an anti-immigrationniste creed inspired by the theses of Guillaume Faye.
Strategies and practices of the movement French nationalist-revolutionist: departures, intentions and destiny of Radical Unit (1989-2002)
| Random links: | Guy Xhonneux | Stadium (Toulouse) | Robert Nelson | Berà | Norauto |