Pragmata

The pragmata are the human businesses at Aristote.

" to include/understand the human businesses (pragmata), force is to exile itself out of the empire of the signs to approach with the poor kingdom of the object, “of the inhuman machines” " Governed Debray History of the 4 M Books of Médiologie n°6 p. 11 1998 == Classer human businesses ==

One of the concerns for Aristote is Classer on the one hand what it observes in the Nature, on the other hand the human businesses.

Today, the Classification of the pragmata is induced by the practices of Recherche. For the common Direction, the human Pensée is the object of the Psychologie and the Psychanalyse, the Comportement S and practices of group the object of the Psycho-sociologie, and the social Pratiques the object of the Sociologie.

In fact, it of it is nothing. In particular a human business “total” can be looked by several disciplines. For example a social Practical as the realization of a Online encyclopedia can be looked by various disciplines. The Sociologue will look at what that changes on the level of large the human groups. The Psychosociologue will be interested in such “Bande contributors” - for example those which intervene on the articles of Biologie, of motor bike or history of the religions. The psychologist will lean for example on the “profit Narcissique” of the contributor.

Among the pragmata one can thus distinguish various categories. For example social Practical , practices of group, practices individual, Thought S, Perception S, Religious practices, practices of writing and Reading, practices of Mediation and Media tisation.

One sees through these examples how much it is difficult to specify the subcategories of the pragmata category, then under-under categories, etc

There exist many systems “Officiel S” of classification which propose an order for the pragmata. Often questions of opinion, from Doxa, come to interfere with the activity of classification of the pragmata which one could think “objective”. For example such system states-unien will classify the Programmation neuro-linguistics among the scientific disciplines while this same PNL is described as “Secte” by certain authors in France.

To consider the whole of the pragmata again

Starting from the philosophical project of Descartes, radicalized by Auguste Count which separated the study from the “human businesses” in various disciplines, the pragmata , in a certain manner, “remained in plan” as a Objet (philosophy) of reflection as a whole.

In the world of the 21e century, a certain number of researchers note that it is necessary to again consider the systems - the human system , the Nature, etc - in their Environnement and their globality.

See Holisme and Globalisme.

Rene Dubos thus introduced the formula: “To act local, think total”.

For example, the ecological Empreinte is estimated today by the ecologist S on the scale of the Ground, or at best by Continent, or by energy sources, means Empirique S, so that it is difficult to make of it a precise estimate for a given system.

In particular quantitative aspects, prevent from making the Synthèse of all the Concept S developed in all the disciplines on all the pragmata. It follows the need for inventing new approaches - for example Multiréférentielle S - which make it possible to consider the pragmata at the same time in their Transversalité S and sufficiently specific dimensions to produce a positive Discours (and not positivist) accessible.

See too

External bond

Artistote and the pragmata

Random links: