Peter Lynds

Peter Lynds , born the May 17th 1975, is a Néo-Zélandais which suddenly drew the attention of the media in 2003 with the publication of an article to the study of the Temps, of the Mécanique and the Paradoxes of Zénon. Lynds was at the university only for six months. Its career of physicist began in 2001 with the sending of one article to the review Foundations off Physics Letters entitled Time and Classical Mechanics: Indeterminacy vs. Discontinuity . At this time, Lynds was not affiliated with a university and it simply subjected its personal address, with Wellington.

Lynds was made known following an press article relayed thereafter by the Web site of new Eurekalert.org scientists the July 31st 2003. Such an amount of the subject article of Lynds which the manner that this one was made known by media were prone to controversy. An article of the Guardian of the August 14th 2003 reports this controversy.

Work of Lynds turns around the idea of the Temps, something which, says it, interested it its life during. The principal conclusion of its work of physics is that there is a difference necessary in any physical length to a given time, for its continuity in time. More specifically, a precise moment ago in the movement, and as its position changes constantly in time, and thus is never determined, it does not have there, at any moment, of given relative position. Lynds claims that is the good resolution of the paradox of Zénon - paradox considering that an object moving constantly has a relative position determined in time, thus making movements of the static body at this time and allowing this impossible situation from where the paradox is derived. A possible consequence of this conclusion is that there is no position relative determined to a certain moment, neither swiftness, neither acceleration, neither momentum, neither mass, neither energy, nor no physical measurement precisely given in time either.

Other consequences of work of physics of Lynds are that time does not pass or does not progress, that in relation to the indetermination in precise physical measurement, the microscopic one and the macroscopic one inextriquablement are inextriquablement bound and are both of the parts of the same piece, rather than the first is only at the base and contributes to the second, than the Chronon S, the so-called atoms of time, are not compatible with such a physical description, than it does not appear necessary for time to emerge or to solidify starting from the Big bang, and than the theory of the imaginary time of Stephen Hawking appears unimportant, considering that the relative order of the events which are relevant, not the direction of time itself, considering time does not go in any direction. Consequently, it becomes unimportant for the order of the sequence of the events to relate imaginary, or in a certain direction, to another event.

Since the publication of the first article, Lynds continued its work on the relation between time and the Conscience, the Perception and the functions of the Cerveau. Its most important conclusion in this field is that what seems to be our innate design subjective of the moment Présent in time, and the phenomenon of the awakening, are actually only one and even thing.

External bonds

the personal Web site of Peter Lynds
The strange story off Peter Lynds. Article of the Guardian on Peter Lynds.
the article of Lynds over time.
Time' S Up, Einstein. Article in the Wired .

Random links: