The medical interruption of pregnancy (IMG) can be indicated when the Grossesse seriously endangers the life of the mother or when the Fœtus is reached of an incurable grave disease at the time of the diagnosis. It is possible in France at any age of the pregnancy until the term of the pregnancy.
See also: Voluntary interruption of pregnancy, Abortion
On the other hand, the Fœtus has, with the eyes of the French law , no legal existence as anybody. It is only with the birth that it obtains the statute of anybody. The existence of this “Hiatus” in the French law makes it possible to cause the death of a fetus In utero by medical techniques (when this act is licit), then to start the childbirth on a died fetus, without exposing itself to the crime of assassination (which is applicable only to the legal people).
The terms of the Loi Veil-Furrier (in particular article 162-12 of the Public health code) form a framework deliberately little “ directif ”, in agreement with the state of knowledge of the time (1979), leaving an important degree of medical interpretation. Practical methods of “ the medical interruption of grossesse ” since were specified, inter alia, by article 13 of law 94-654 of July 29th, 1994, which specifies that: “ Moreover, if the termination of pregnancy is considered with the reason which there exists a strong probability that the child to be born is reached of an affection of a particular gravity recognized like incurable at the time of the diagnosis, one of these two doctors must carry on his activity in a center of prenatal diagnosis pluridisciplinaire ”.
cardiac Pathology serious, with cardiac risk of decompensation during the pregnancy
In these cases of Pathology S nursery schools, the opinion of two medical experts, of which one expert of maternal pathology and the other, if possible, member of a diagnostic center anténatal, is necessary.
Malformation of a functional body lethal in the more or less short term (renal sterility, pulmonary hypoplasy, extreme inescapable prematurity)
In these situations, the opinion of the parents is dominating. After consultations near several specialists concerned (obstetrician, infantile surgeon, neuro-pediatrist, cardio-pediatrist, geneticist, psychiatrist…), the couple Formula One a request, which is examined by a multi-field diagnostic center anténatal. The diagnostic center antenatal then delivers an opinion (favorable or unfavourable) on the IMG.
It varies according to the term of the pregnancy at the time of the interruption.
In the rare circumstances where the low way is impossible (placenta in front of the collar, for example), a mini-Cesarean is possible.
The 22 weeks limit is essential since beyond this term the child is regarded as such (right to the burial, leave maternity, although the paternal leave is not granted in the event of IMG…) what is not the front case.
The risk to obtain a child living with the birth being important, one first of all carries out a foeticide the purpose of which is to result in the death of the fetus in utero. It is carried out by injection in the umbilical cord (cordocentèse) by way transabdominale (as for a amniocentèse) of morphine powerful (Sufentanyl) if need be to anaesthetize the fetus followed by the injection of the product to the properties foeticides (Xylocaïne) in a repeated way. In the event of failure of the procedure, the gesture foeticide can be supplemented by the Potassium Chloride injection which is used exclusively only by intracardiac way.
The release of work is then obtained by prostaglandin catch, with possibly rupture of the pocket of water, in the form of an induced delivery, generally under anesthesia Péridurale.
The moral aspects of the IMG are multiple and continue to make run much ink…
In itself, the concept of “risk” of serious malformation is very subjective, each couple being free to choose the risk which it agrees to run to have a child (any pregnancy being in any case a taking risk). The diagnostic center anténatal must appreciate in conscience if the theoretical risk or not justifies to stop the pregnancy.
The concept of “unacceptable quality of life” is it also very subjective. One can understand for example that a couple of pianist would live like a terrible handicap the sterility of a hand in their child. There still, the mission of the diagnostic center anténatal is “to replace” this quality of life in a general direction.
The concept of “mental handicap” is entirely subjected to the idea that is made the company of it. One can wonder how by this company the handicap of the Trisomie 21 would be felt, for example, if the structures of assumption of responsibility of such children were developed, with a real will to integrate in the company of the individuals into IQ certainly lower than the normal, but happy of living with.
Lastly, the risk of eugenic drift is often mentioned because of the current idea of “perfect single child”, who makes fear excesses. To limit these possibilities of drifts, the conditions to grant a IMG are very strict. Moreover, the statistics show well that the parents who decide of a IMG make it while thinking of the possible or unquestionable suffering of their child and not because it is not " parfait".
| Random links: | Percentage occupied time of the grounds | Anton Rubinstein | List old municipalities of Quebec | AMD Live! | Glove gilded (first goal) |