The law of program 2006-450 of April 18th, 2006 for research is a French law on the Scientific research. It is most important concerning with this field since the law of 1982 of orientation and programming for the research and the technological development of France.
This first project highly disputed by all the trade unions of teaching, of the Conference of the presidents of university and the collective Let us save research, envisaged many changes:
a financing which would divert EPST
Not having adopted yet at the time of the referendum of 2005, it was mainly taken again by the Gouvernement Dominique de Villepin. In particular, the majority of the provisions criticized by the actors of research, nevertheless were retained in the final law.
Another provision supplements the L.111-3 article of the code of research for better revealing the role of research in the Sustainable development.
The law also endeavors to facilitate the co-operation between the various actors of research. It in particular envisages to create poles of research and higher education (NEAR). CLOSE gathers several organizations, of which at least a public corporation in scientific, cultural and professional matter (EPSCP), others pertaining to the one of the following categories: EPSCP, EPST, CHU, Center of fight against cancer, private organization of higher education and/or research. Can join Close to the associations, of the local government agencies or the Entreprise S. the participants in CLOSE can be French or European.
On a similar model, the law envisages also the creation of networks sets of themes of advanced research or centers sets of themes of research and care.
These three new systems of co-operation can either function without constituting of new moral person, or to take the form of groupings of public interest, or to adopt one of the new legal forms envisaged by the law.
These new forms are:
On the financial plan, the law institutes specific individual allowances for the young people Enquiring S. It also provides that the collective agreements will be able to recognize the Doctorat like a specific qualification level affecting the level of remuneration or on the professional situation (Code of research, Article L.411-4).
The law of program includes/understands provisions touching with the evaluation of research. The L.114-1 article of the code of research lays out now that: The research activities financed in whole or part on public funds, realized by public operators or deprived, are evaluated on the basis of objective criterion adapted to each one of them and taking as a starting point the best international practices. Among these criteria, the contributions to the development of the scientific culture are taken in compte.
The National committee of evaluation of the public corporations in scientific, cultural and professional matter and the National committee of evaluation of research amalgamate to form the Agence of evaluation of research and the higher education, which receives the statute of independent Administrative authority. It is charged to evaluate the public corporations of higher education and research, like their structures of co-operation, to evaluate the formations and diplomas of higher education, finally to define the conditions of the evaluation of the researchers.
The National agency of the research, which was a grouping of public interest, becomes a public corporation.
Some modifications are made to the code of research, to facilitate the passage of the public researchers in the company, either in a temporary way, or definitively for a reconversion. Provisions are also designed to enable them to profit from a leave to take part in the creation or the management of a Jeune innovating company.
The public corporations of research are authorized to entrust the utilization of the results of research to a privately held company.
Lastly, the Académie of technologies is transformed into public corporation.
According to article 36, the administration of the Institute is ensured by the central administrative commission, which elect the chancellor of the Institute, and by the general meeting of the members of the Institute. Each academy is managed by its members, who indicate an executive commission and a perpetual secretary (two for the Academy of Science).
These four articles hardly bring change, but give a legislative force to formerly scattered provisions.
| Random links: | Loulad | Hook (tooth) | Ramsey Clark | Park of Achy | Jean-Baptiste Couvelet |