Joseph ibn Caspi , Joseph Ben Abba Husband Ben Joseph Ben Caspi Jacob of his complete name (1279, Argentière - 1340), also known under its name of Provence of SEN Bonfos or Gift Bonafoux of Argentière (Gift Bonafous de Largentera), is a Rabbin and Jewish philosopher averroïste of the 13th century
It will carry out from there the many ones and long voyages, of which most notable are:
In 1317, it is established with Arles, in Provence, where it bound with Kalonymos Ben Kalonymos (Shem Tov Ben Shem Tov) Ben Meïr, and where it wrote his introduction to the Pentateuque, the Tirat Kessef (cf will infra), which was worth to him to be scrambled with Kalonymos Ben Kalonymos and the Masters of this one.
He died in 1340, probably during a voyage
Influenced by Maïmonide, Averroès and particularly Abraham ibn Ezra, of which it follows the idea of construction philosophical grammar Hebraic, it defends the idea that the literal Sens of the Writings is to be taken… literally, and will not hesitate to criticize the interpretation that makes Maïmonide of it, for which many prophetic accounts are to be taken as allegories.
In a surprising way little, its most known work is the Sefer ha-Shorashim , delivers roots, where it establishes a dictionary under the terms of the etymology and the homonymy of the biblical terms.
It shares nevertheless the rationalizing attitude of Averroès towards the miracles, regarding them as natural phenomena of which we do not have the knowledge of all the physical causes chairing it. To include/understand a miracle, it is necessary to be put in the context of its narrators, and to include/understand their points of view and their knowledge at this time precise.
In the same way, it is necessary to interpret prophecy by taking account of the fact that it was to produce an outstanding effect on crowd, and if we do not include/understand all the aspects of them, it is necessary to charge of them our distance with respect to the moment of the occurrence of the facts and speeches prophetic. The prophet includes/understands the future, because it analyzes perfectly them holding and outcomes of the present and their consequences. In the final analysis, Ibn Caspi leaves little place to the divine aspect there.
Many religious assertions do not tend so much to deliver a message " vrai" , that to teach with crowd how to behave and justify them to do it.
When prophecy and philosophy diverge, we must remember that they are not of comparable nature and cannot thus coincide, since, despite everything, we do not know why they said what they said, and why the miracles take the form which they take. If we knew it, perhaps would see us us that prophecy could be brought back, with few things close, with philosophical truths more easily comprehensible by the common run of people.
However, our comprehension of the assertions not being, and not being able to be total, we must accept them, as aspects of our faith, although we can remain convinced that these assertions are rather equivalent to the philosophical truths.
Contrary to Maimonide and Averroès, Ibn Caspi did not think that the secrecies of interpretation were to be held for intelligentsia. Within sight of the differences between contexts, times, audiences, knowledge, languages, etc, it had inevitably dug a ditch which did not have to be tried to fill. Consequently, the secrecy remained secret.
Mishne Kessef (not to be confused with Kessef Mishne of Yossef Karo) is a comment kabbalistic and ethicophilosophic on the Pentateuque, in two parts.
| Random links: | Ultima III | Yoon Kwang-ung | Champions of France of swimming out of basin of 50 m of the 4x200 m freestyle | Amy Holton | Exchanger of Antwerp-Center |