Hydrino

What is what a hydrino?

For the moment the hydrino is only one assumption formulated by a researcher of the name of Randell Mills (initially doctor before studying with the Massachusetts Institute off Technology). Approximately, the hydrino would be a theoretical particle which one obtains by forcing a hydrogen atom to compress itself (a new state of the hydrogen atom). It would consist of only one Proton around whose a electron would circulate which would be more close than in hydrogen the Atome to the fundamental state. Formation of this hydrino would result an energy source which would make it possible to release up to thousand times more heat than usual fuels. Released energy corresponds to the potential energy of connection between the proton and the electron.

Moreover, its existence, if it were shown, would call into question all the principles of the Quantum physics. According to the American physicists: " the phenomenon would be simply impossible" , which was worth many criticisms to him on its theories. But certain scientists, such Rick Maas (specialist in renewable energies), support its thesis.

Maas declares “All those among us who examined work of Dr. Mills and which is not quantum physicists find this work very convincing,… Dr. Booker and myself on top have both put our reputation concerned.”

According to Millets , the only explanation to this discovery would be an error in quantum mechanics. Let us recall that the quantum Mécanique has been one of the theories best checked for one century, having predicted a considerable number of specific phenomena before they are confirmed by the experiment.

The theory developed by Millets for exhiber hypothetical the hydrino, the CQM: large unified theory off classical quantum mechanics is proposed by the author like consistent, deterministic, and invariant by the Transformation of Lorentz.

Andreas Rathke showed in an article called has critical analysis off the hydrino model that invariance by the Transformation of Lorentz (i.e. the constancy speed of light) is not obtained. That hydrogen can exist there only in one state (not excited state), which is contradictory with the basic chemistry and also with the existence of the hydrino.

Bob Park and Aaron Barth affirms when with them that the CQM quite simply comprises miscalculations which make it null and void as of the first pages. They are even astonished to find chapters without errors after having read the first!

According to Maas , produced energy would be about 5 times less expensive than coal (32.85€/MWh source DGEMP) and 6 times less expensive than the nuclear power (28,40€/MWh, source DGEMP).

How could one manufacture it?

First of all, it would be necessary to extract from the molecules of Hydrogène of water, then one would separate dihydrogene in individual atoms of Hydrogène. With a Catalyst (like the atoms of potassium, or the strontium ions), one would cause a reaction with the atoms of Hydrogène. Following the catalysis, the hydrogen atom crumbles. It is transformed into Hydrino , releasing a great quantity of energy.

Future prospects

The professor Mills affirms (in 2005) that in the near future, (within 4 years) the first product which would apply this discovery would be the domestic heating. The tests of such a heating could make it possible to carry out tests to check if there is well an unexplainable energy source within the framework of the current theories.

Without same using the quantum physics, the operation or not of this heating will make it possible to take a decision: physical revolution or miscalculation?

The author having proposed this theory like a means of propulsion of rockets, NASA undertook a study on the subject and declared this theory nonconclusive ( inconclusive ), which is a correct term Politiquement meaning Ca does not go .

The assertion about NASA carries to guarantee (cf the following document which seems to confirm the observations of Millets: http://www.hydrino.org/Labs/NASA-Technical-Memo-107167.pdf)

However, we have any information on becoming to it hydrino for the moment. What poses problems on the question of the pollution of this new product.

One can as wonder about the inexistence noted in a natural state of an element extremely more stable as the most widespread element in the universe: hydrogen (if the passage of hydrogen to the hydrino releases much energy, then the hydrino is much more stable than hydrogen).

Cold fusion?

The hydrino of Millets resembles curiously the hydrex of Jacques Dufour and Jacques Foos, of the Cnam. A hydrex is a narrowed hydrogen atom, i.e. with an electron closer to the proton than in the fundamental state. The formation process is different: the hydrex would be formed in the solids under the effect of an intense electromagnetic field. The hydrex was imagined to explain certain phenomena of cold Fusion.

On the question of cold fusion, Mills remains discrete not to discredit its theory, since cold fusion has bad reputation among the scientific community. He affirms nevertheless that the assumption of the hydrino could explain cold fusion.

Sources

international Mail n°789-15 Dec. 2005 (translation of the Guardian) Science and life n°1040- May 2004

For more information, one can consult the site of Blacklight Power (undertaken Millets) (site not-neutral)

Random links: