|}

See also: Amorce=voir also, List of the areas of the European Union

who also comprises exclusions for certain geographical and historical reasons.

• Another chart of the Convention countries

Geography

See also: Amorce=voir the general article of the, Geography of Europe

The majority of the territories of the European Union are on the continent of Europe. Because of its colonial past, Europe has also a certain number of non-European territories on all the continents of the sphere, with share Asia.

On the continent of Europe

The Union extends since the parallel 35e in the Mediterranean until beyond polar circle in Scandinavia.

Several mountainous solid masses extend in the Union. The culminating point is reached with the Mount Blanc, in the the Alps. By decreasing order of altitude, one finds for example:

1. the the Alps (4 810 m) (totality except the Swiss Alps)

2. the Teide on the island of Tenerife (3 718 m)
3. the Sierra Nevada (3 480 m with the Mulhacén)
4. the the Pyrenees (3 404 m with the peak of Aneto Spanish slope)
5. the Sicily (3 350 m with the mount Etna, changing with the liking of the eruptions)
6. the Rila 2.925 m with the Mussala
7. the Mount Olympe with the Mitikas 2.918 m
8. the Pirin 2.915 m with Vihren
9. the Corsica (2 706 m with the Monte Cinto)
10. the Carpates (2 655 m with the Mount Gerlachovský)
11. the Crete (2 456 m)
12. the Pico (2.351) of the the Azores
13. the the Scandinavian Alps (2 111 m) (totality except the Norwegian Scandinavian Alps)
14. the Massif Central (1 886 m with the Puy de Sancy)
15. the Sardinia
16. the the Jura (totality except the Swiss Jura)
17. the Sudètes (1 602 m)
18. the Black Forest (1 493 m)
19. the Forest of Bavaria (1 456 m)
20. the the Vosges (1 424 m)
21. the Mounts Grampians (1 343 m)
22. the Metalliferous Mounts (1 244 m)
23. the Harz (1 142 m)
24. the Fichtelgebirge (1 053 m)
25. the the Jura souabe (1 015 m)
26. the Forest of Thuringe (982 m)
27. the Rhön (950 m)
28. the Taunus (882 m)
29. the Rothaargebirge (843 m)
30. the Hunsrück (816 m)
31. the Vogelsberg (773 m)
32. the Eiffel (747 m)
33. the the Ardennes (694 m)
34. the the Westerwald (657 m)
35. the Odenwald (626 m)
36. the Armorican Massive (417 m)

A big number of islands is included in the European Union. Largest are Great Britain and Ireland. But the majority of the islands of the EU are at sea the Mediterranean.

1. Great Britain
2. Ireland
3. Corsica Sardinia
4. Sicily
6. Cyprus
7. Malta
8. Crete
9. Balearic Islands
10. the Canaries
11. the Azores
12. Madeira

Many lakes are in the Union, mainly between the Alps and the Jura, and especially in Scandinavia. Vastest are:

1. the lakes Vänern and Vättern (Sweden)
2. the lakes Saimaa, Hauki and Suvas (lake plate of Finland)
3. the Lake Peïpous, or lake of Tchoudes (Estonia/Russia; partly only in the EU)
4. the Lake Balaton (Hungary)
5. the Lake Léman (France/Swiss; partly only in the EU)
6. the Lake of Constancy, or Bodensee (Germany and Swiss Austria/; partly only in the EU)
7. the Lake Garda (Italy)

Country and territories out of the European Union wedged in this one

Some enclaves are contained in the Union; some are without access to the sea:

• the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad (access to the sea)
• the Swiss and the Liechtenstein (not of access to the sea);
• the Western Balkans:
• the Croatia (access to the sea);
• the Albania (access to the sea);
• the Bosnia Herzégovine (access to the sea);
• the Serbia, including the Kosovo (not of access to the sea);
• the Montenegro (access to the sea);
• the old Yugoslav republic of Macedonia (not of access to the sea);
• Andorra (not of access to the sea)
• Monaco (access to the sea)
• two small landlocked States of the Italian peninsula
• the Vatican (not of access to the sea)
• San Marino (not of access to the sea)

Areas ultra-peripherals of the European Union on other continents and areas with specific statute in the EU

• in North America :
• in the Northern Atlantic Ocean: Saint-Pierre-and-Miquelon
• in the the Caribbean: the French West Indies (the Martinique, the Guadeloupe, the island of Saint Martin's day (left French), the island of St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre)
• in South America : the French Guiana
• in Europe : Åland, Corsica community of
• in Occidental Asia : Cyprus (including the zones of British sovereignty, but not the Turkish autonomous region in the East of the island)
• in Africa :
• at the edge of the Mediterranean: Malta, autonomous cities of Ceuta and Melilla and other zones of Spanish sovereignty in Africa (uninhabited)
• in the Northern Atlantic Ocean: Madeira, the the Azores, the the Canaries
• in the Indian Ocean: the island of the Meeting, Mayotte

Autonomous territories or with special statute out of the European Union, dependant on country of the EU

• in North America :
• in the Northern Pacific Ocean: the island of Clipperton
• in the Northern Atlantic Ocean: the Greenland, the Bermuda
• in the Caribbean: the Dutch West Indies (left Dutchwoman Sint-Maarten, islands of Bonaire, Curaçao, Sheba, Saint-Eustace), Aruba, the Antilles British (Anguilla, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Montserrat, the Turkish islands and Caïques)
• in South America : the Falkland Islands (Falklands), the South Georgia and the islands Sandwich of the South
• in Europe : the Faroe Islands, and dependences of the British Crown associated with the United Kingdom (the island of Man, old the Anglo-Norman islands: baillage of Jersey, baillage of Guernesey and dependences)
• in Asia : part of Cyprus (Turkish zone), the British Territory of the Indian Ocean.
• in Africa :
• in the Southern Atlantic Ocean: the island Grey waxbill, the island of the Rise, the Archipelago Tristan da Cunha
• in the Western Indian Ocean: the Scattered islands (uninhabited, district of the TAAF)
• in Oceania :
• in the Southern Indian Ocean: several districts of TAAF (the islands Kerguelen, the islands Saint-Paul-and-Amsterdam, the islands Crozet)
• in the Southern Pacific Ocean: Wallis-and-Futuna, the French Polynesia, the New Caledonia, Pitcairn
• in the Antarctic (not recognized internationally): the Ad3elie coast (district of the TAAF), the British Territory of the Antarctic

Institutions and policy

The European Union is equipped with five institutions, which play each one a specific role:

• the the European Parliament, whose members are directly elected by the citizens of the Member States, has a Co-legislature role with the Council of the Union and vote only the budget;
• the European commission (driving of the Union and its executive body);
• the Conseil of the European Union (component legislative of the Union where the ministers by speciality meet, representing the governments of the Member States);
• the Court of justice (guaranteed respect of the legislation and at the same time creative of European right);
• the Court of Auditors (control committee of the correct and legal use of the budget of the Union).

Beside these five institutions, one finds six other bodies important:

• the European Council (it gives to the Union the impulses necessary to its development and the main trends of its policies)
• the Economic and Social Committee (it expresses the opinions of the civil society organized in the fields economic and social);
• the Committee of the Areas (it expresses the opinions of the local government agencies and regional);
• the European Central bank (it is responsible for the monetary policy and the management of the euro);
• the European Mediator (it treats the complaints of the European citizens for bad administration on behalf of the institutions or bodies of the Union);
• the European Investment Bank (it contributes to the realization of the objectives of the Union by financing investment plans);

In addition, the European Union is chaired by a country in turn for a six months period; it is what one calls the Rotating presidency

Mode of governorship

The governorship of the EU always oscillated between the model of the intergovernmental conference, where the States preserve the whole of their prerogatives, and the supranational model, where part of the sovereignty of the States is delegated to the Union.

In the first case, the Community decisions are in fact of the treaties between States which must thus be taken unanimously. This model, near to the principle of the traditional intergovernmental organizations, is defended by the current Eurosceptic. According to them, only the Heads of State have democratic legitimacy to represent their citizens. In fact thus the nations must control the institutions of the Union.

The second case is that of the federalistic current europhile and . They estimate that the institutions must represent the citizens directly. For them, with the widening of the Union with 25 Member States in 2004, then to 27 at the beginning of 2007, the methods of decision making within the institutions must be adapted in order to avoid any risk of paralysis.

Today the European Union uses a hybrid mode of governorship: the Council of Ministers is the representative of the States (for the decisions not requiring the unanimity, the voices of each State are however balanced by their demographic weights), and the Parliament the representative of the citizens.

The model of governorship of the Union is thus today one of the Enjeu X of the fights of influence between the various European institutions: Parliament, European commission and the Council of Ministers.

Principles

The documents produced by the Commission (in particular the White papers) and the treaties state certain principles. They govern many decisions:

• the increase in European Union strengthens peace between the nations members.
• Certain fields (of which the economy) are managed better at community level rather than national.
• In these fields the files are prepared by technicians (of the Commission assisted by lobbies).
• the economy is optimal in a " saving in marché" where the " is allowed; free competition and not faussée".
• the obstacles with competition and the trade are exceptions which it is a question of reducing.

The European Union rests on three principles of liberty: - economic freedom with freedom of movement of the goods; goods transport is done without payment of customs duty inside the Union; - individual freedom with freedom of movement of the people; any citizen of a Convention country to the possibility of settling and of working in the country of its choice; - financial freedom with freedom of movement of the capital; any citizen or company of a Convention country little to open an bank account in the country of its choice. These principles are questioned in other articles:

• Debate on the European Union
• Debate on the European constitutional treaty

Processus of decision

See also: Amorce= See the articles on the, Decision-making process, Operation of the European commission

Two principles guide the Decision-making process S of the European Union since the Traité EU (1992): the principle of subsidiarity and the principle of proportionality. These principles are the subject of protocols annexed to the Traité of Amsterdam (1997).

• the European commission is seen entrusted Right to take initiatives on the preparation of the majority of the Dossier S concerning the First pillar of the European Union (CAP, Euro,…), and this right with the Member States divides on the two other pillars.

• the European Council allots to each Member State a number of voices (redefined in 2001 by the Traité of Nice), which determine the adoption or not voted laws. The European Constitution, pushed back by France by referendum in 2005, envisaged to modify this system of voice by a system of double qualified majority based on the population of each Member State (reinforcing the capacity of France).

• Only body directly elected by the Citizen S of the Union, the the European Parliament acquired during the recent history an increasingly important weight: simple consultative body at the beginning, it acquired a reality capacity of Codécision to parity with the Council of Ministers for many files. In 2004, it even could influence the nomination of the European commission. Its representativeness remains however handicapped by the rates of abstention to the elections from the European deputies generally higher than those from the national elections.

The prélégislative activity of the European Union is the subject in theory of an alarm system of the French Parlement, according to the procedure of article 88-4 of the Constitution of 1958.

In short:

• the president of the European commission takes part in the meetings of the European Council. At the conclusion of the Summits, the European Council writes conclusions which he addresses to the European commission.

• the Commission has a monopoly of the right to take initiatives in the first pillar of the European Union which enables him to weigh in the formation of the acts of the Council of the Union and the Parliament. Article 250 TCE still increases the importance of this role: it stipulates that the Council of the Union “can take a note constituting amendment of the proposal only unanimously taking a decision”. The Council of the Union can thus deviate from the Commission proposal only unanimously, which sometimes confers on the Commission a role of conciliation between Member States.

• the Parliament cannot propose laws (regulations and directives), but it can deposit amendments and use of its veto in certain fields. The Parliament sits in Brussels and Strasbourg

• the monopoly of the right to take initiatives of the commission knows limits. The Parliament and the Council of the Union can ask the Commission which she legislates in a field. Moreover, within the framework of the second and the third pillars, the commission shares the right to take initiatives with the Member States.

• the Council (of the ministers) of the European Union prepares the meetings of the European Council and adopts, with the European Parliament, the legal texts which will translate into actions the orientations fixed by the Heads of State or government.

• the governments of the Member States will transpose these legislations in their States (checking of the transpositions by the European Court of justice)

Dispute

The European Union is sometimes décriée for its character insufficiently judged Démocratique, its opponents describing it as “Technocratie”. Certain parties Souverainiste S oppose the European Construction, or criticize it on this basis.

A report/ratio (sept.2006) of Bernard Carayon watch that in practice political control does not exist, apart from that which can exert the parliamentary Europeans. There is no formal structure of dialog between the European members of Parliament and the national members of Parliament. This report/ratio recommends that the Council of State is seized as for the legal contents of the texts under development, under its function of legal council of the Gouvernement.

See also: Souveraineté#Construction European, Sovereignty and European construction

Particular co-operations

Certain countries of the European Union grouped in order to advance together on joint projects in which other Convention countries do not wish to take part. These projects bear the name of Coopérations reinforced, and are clearly defined and subjected to conditions by the Constitution in the process of ratification.

Among the projects which do not concern all the members of the Union, one finds: Euro (it is however the common currency of the Union and only two Member States obtained a clause known as of opting-out ), Europol (police collaboration), the space Schengen (organization of freedom of movement of the goods and people), the Mécanisme of European rate of exchange, etc There exist moreover institutions which functions apart from the framework of the Union, like the European space agency.

Some consider, as a practitioner of the policy-fiction, that the possible failure of the ratification of the constitutional treaty would launch a new wave of co-operations reinforced between country eager to go from the front one. Among the countries quoted for possible closer co-operations, one quotes in general the France, the Germany, the countries of the Benelux, the Italy…

Relations with the European countries non-members

• the European Economic space (EEE):

• created in 1994, it associates the Member States of the EU with three countries of the EFTA (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway). The Swiss , another member of EFTA, refused this adhesion after popular Votation. This space opened the European market with these three countries and prepares them with a possible adhesion (that the Norway refused twice by Référendum, in 1972 and 1994).
• Application of great freedoms of circulation to these three countries: n the other hand they must accept responsibility for the Community legal asset.

• the European Union concluded from the bilateral agreements with the Suisse.

• Agreements with the small countries (Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, the Vatican but also of the territories like the island of Man, Jersey, Guernesey, the Faroe Islands).

To take again the formula of Jean Monnet, Europe was not made in one day, or in one year, it is an old idea which spent years to be concretized.

1957 : “Europe of the Six”: The current European Union is at the beginning the result of the will of the 6 countries founders. In 1957: the Germany, the Belgium, the France, the Italy, the Luxembourg and the Netherlands create the European Economic community (the EEC).

1973 : “Europe of the Last nines” Adhesion of the Denmark, the Ireland and the the United Kingdom.

1981 : “Europe of the Ten” the Greece enters in its turn the European Community.

1986 : “The Twelve” Adhesion of the Spain and the Portugal.

1990 : “The Twelve” Reunification of Germany (old the German Democratic republic forms part of the Twelve then)

1995 : “Europe of the Fifteen” Adhesion of the Austria, the Finland and the Sweden.

2004 : “Europe of the Twenty-five” Adhesion of Cyprus, Malta, of the Slovenia, the Poland, the Hungary, the Czech Republic, the Estonia, the Latvia, the Lithuania, the Slovakia.

2007 : “Europe of Twenty-seven” the Bulgaria and the Romania signed a Treaty of Accession in April 2005 which came into effect on January 1st 2007. The Slovenia adopts the euro.

For the future: if the Macedonia is candidate since 2004, the Croatia on the other hand, also candidate, saw the carryforward sine die of the opening of its negotiations of adhesion in 2005, because of a co-operation considered to be insufficient with the International penal court. The negotiations between the European Union and the Croatia finally began the October 3rd 2005.

The Turkey is a candidate, often disputed (initially for geographical reasons, for the not-recognition of Cyprus, non-observance of the Human rights…), to adhere to the European Union, in spite of a unanimous declaration in this direction, the Council of the Union as of December 1999 (with Helsinki).

See also: Amorce=voir articles on the, Widening of the European Union, Limiting of Europe

Foreign relations of the European Union

August 1st

The European Union has gradually obtained common mechanisms of action with other countries and continents, like within the international institutions. Thus the European countries express themselves with one voice in many circumstances in the debates in the United Nations and in a permanent way within OMC.

One of the original aspects of these foreign relations is the history of long life tied with the countries known as ACP (Africa, the Caribbean, the Pacific), of which much was colonies of European countries (the Lome Convention, Accord of Cotonou, Partnership agreements economic being negotiated).

Economy of the EU

See also: Amorce=voir the principal article:, Economy of the European Union

the European Union is the first world economic power in 2006 with 29,89% of the world GDP (the World Bank, Total GDP 2006). It is thus the first agricultural power (1st world importer and 2nd exporter) with the United States, the first world power of services and the first industrial power of the world.

It is in the middle of the world exchanges while being:

• the first business partner of the United States,
• the first training partner of China,
• the first business partner of India,
• the first business partner of Russia,
• the first business partner of the country composing Mercosur

Budget and action plans of the EU

See also: Amorce=Voir the principal article:, Budget of the European Union

Each country takes part in the European budget, and receives assistances of the European Union according to its economic situation and the richness of its inhabitants.

It is the commission of Romano Prodi which proposed the budget for 2007 - 2013 (7 years), of 1025 billion euros - that is to say 1,24% of the GDP of the UE-, with the European Council, which refuses. In June 2005, Jean-Claude Juncker and the Luxembourg presidency proposes a compromise has 871 billion is 1,06% of the GDP, 20 countries accept, but the United Kingdom poses its veto to protect its “British Rabais” and to underline the cost of the CAP. In December 2005, the United Kingdom proposes a budget of 846,7 billion d'€ is 1,03% of the GDP of the Europe of the 25. In the 16 December 17th night, a median agreement is found with 862,3 Mds d'€ is 1,045% of the GDP.
Les successive tensions which reduced the proposal from 1025 billion (expert of the commission) to the 862,3 Mds of the final agreement, pushed by the British, finally seems to arrange all the “rich” countries of the EU (Germany, France, Italy, the United Kingdom) which build of their financial participation the largest part of the European budget. Injured countries being the 10 new Eastern European countries, which had to admit to see their hopes of assistance to the fall: none of these 10 countries not receiving a similar help have those granted to Ireland (388,7€/h.), Portugal (300,4€/h.), Spain (200,1€/h.) or Greece (378,5€/h.). The maximum going to the Lithuanians, 105,5€/h., and with the Malteses, 112,5€/h., coutumièrement around the 37,3€/h than receive the Poles.

The European Union has many action plans annual or multiannual in many fields, profiting each one from a community budget. Thus 2004 is the year of the sport.

Employment Policies of the EU

A collateral action until 1997: use and the unemployment absent of the treaties founders

The Treaty of Rome, founder of the European Economic community (the EEC) fixed like objectives the search for a “Economic progress and social balanced and durable” (title first, article B) and the installation of a “Close cooperation” between the Member States as for the relative questions in employment (Ill title, chapter first, article 118). It did not envisage, on the other hand, of specific instrument of fight against unemployment, certainly because the weakness of its level did not justify it.

The objectives by the European authorities is thus above all, within the favourable framework of the Single European market, to restore the competitiveness of the companies and to reabsorb imbalances between offer and demand for labor on the job market. They recommend a greater flexibility on the job markets of the Member States, the adjustment of the real wages according to the labor productivity, a handing-over in question of the mechanisms of compensation for unemployment, as well as a modernization of the systems of formation, that the recently held European Councils strongly encouraged.

The single European market, by allowing the lifting of the nontariff obstacles the intracommunity commercial exchanges, was to support a revival of the economic growth and, therefore, an improvement of the employment picture. The argumentation was founded on the report/ratio which evaluated, conversely, the cost of “Not-Europe”.

With white paper, for the first time employment becomes an element of concern for the European commission. Through this document, it identifies the factors of unemployment in Europe and counts, in glance, a list of recommendation.

At the time of the European Council of Essen, two principles were fixed: the search for a European strategy for the use and the fixing of indicative priorities gathered in an action plan for employment. This “strategy” of Essen was developed by the European Councils of Madrid (1995) and Dublin (1996).

The European Union has five structural bases, whose effects on employment are more or less direct: European regional development fund (FEDER); the Funds European of orientation and agricultural guarantee (EAGGF); the financial Instrument of orientation of fishing (IFOP); Funds of cohesion; funds of a company European (FSE) who, of the four funds, is the only one to be founded to combat unemployment. Create in 1958, the Funds of a company European, is intended to promote the user friendliness and the geographical and professional mobility of the workers, like facilitating the adaptation to the industrial changes and the evolution of the systems of production, in particular by training and the reconversion vocational.

Since 1997, European strategy for employment: treaty of Amsterdam and process of Luxembourg

The treaty of Amsterdam marks a deep change in the community approach of the questions of employment and unemployment. For the first time, the questions of employment are seen of attaching an importance equivalent to that of the other economic aspects of the Union: a title exclusively devoted to employment is integrated in the treaty. The European strategy for employment is not a Community policy, she encourages the co-operation as regards employment by the means of “good practices which constitute instruments of qualitative evaluation and reciprocal influence of the States the ones towards the others; she supports convergence by laying down common objectives.

In November 1997, the extraordinary summit on the use of Luxembourg concretizes the orientations of the treaty of Amsterdam, within the European strategy of employment (SEE). The Member States are invited to reclassify their existing policies within the four pillars of the SEE: to support the employability (capacity of professional insertion); to develop the company spirit; to encourage the capacity of adaptation of the companies and their workers; to reinforce the policies of equal opportunity.

For the first time in the history of European construction, the Member States lay down common targets in precise figure to reduce unemployment. Each government preserves the responsibility for its Employment Policy.

Managements and labor will take part in all these stages of analysis and of formulation, a preparatory meeting will be held every six-month period before the meeting of the Council to carry out an exchange of views on the implementation of the Community Charter of the fundamental social rights of the workers of 1989.

The annual cycle of coordinated implementation and follow-up of the national policies of the employment, known under the name of process of Luxembourg, includes/understands an adaptable annual program of planning, follow-up, analysis and readjustment.

To the process of Luxembourg were added the processes of Cardiff (comprehensive approach of the structural reforms of the markets of the goods, services and capital) and the process of Cologne (respect of the independence and the autonomy of all the speakers of the salary negotiations and the monetary policies), whose integration owes, according to the Commission, to reinforce the strategy for employment in order to make succeed structural reforms and modifications, pledges of a competitive company spirit and promotion of the still latent potential of employment in many sectors and country of the European Union. The employment level is not regarded any more as the resultant of the elimination of the dysfunctions and rigidities of the markets (work, well, capital), but the integration of the reforms on these three markets east, for the European authorities, the condition of the improvement of the employment picture in the Member States of the European Union.

The four fundamental pillars of the European Strategy of employment are declined in the form of guiding lines for employment, which form the concrete transposition in the national policies of the common objectives defined at community level. They are adopted by the Council on Commission proposal and structure the National plans of action for employment (PNAE) worked out by each Member State, according to the principle of subsidiarity.

The National plan of action for employment (PNAE) is a document presented each year by all the Member States. He answers the objections and/or remarks addresses the Member State on the basis of Plan of the previous year. The whole of the PNAE is the subject of an annual review expressed in the “Report/ratio united on the employment”, which makes recommendations with the Member States - initially in total form, then State by State.

Demography

See also: Armorce=voir the principal article:, Demography of the European Union

See also: Amorce=Pour information to more see the articles according to, Immigration policy in the European Union, Mobility in the European Union, Cities of the European Union of more than 100.000 inhabitants

Main cities

The metropolises of London and Paris and conurbation the Rhine-Ruhr constitute the three only urban surfaces of more than 10 million inhabitants who account European Union. Come then conurbation from Randstad (Amsterdam/Rotterdam/$the Hague/Utrecht) and the agglomeration of Madrid, with more de  6 million inhabitants, then twenty agglomerations whose population lies between 2 and 5 million inhabitants (see table below - in bold characters, population of the cities alone of more than 1,5 million inhabitants ).

Three other cities count a little more than one million inhabitants without constituting agglomerations of more than 1,5 million inhabitants:

• Sofia (Bulgaria)
• Prague (Czech Republic)
• Dublin (Ireland)

Symbols

• the European Flag, a circle of twelve gold stars on blue bottom. The stars, represent the people of Europe, and form a circle as a sign of union. They are with the invariable number of twelve, symbol of the perfection and plenitude in the tradition Greek antique, and not, as one could believe it, the twelve countries who formed then part of the EEC, of 1986 to 1995. The flag was adopted the November 8th 1955 by the Committee of the Ministers for the the Council of Europe, expressing the wish to see the other European organizations adopting this same symbol. The the European Parliament takes of it the initiative at the time of a motion for a resolution in 1979, following the first elections of the Parliament to the universal direct suffrage, whereas it sat in buildings of the Council of Europe with Strasbourg where floated already says it European flag. This resolution is adopted in 1983, confirmed by the Council of Ministers in June 1985 and application in 1986, in all the Community institutions;

• the European Anthem: the Ode with the joy, melody drawn from the 9th symphony of Ludwig van Beethoven (1823), whose arrangement of Herbert von Karajan was retained by the Council of Europe like official European anthem in 1972;
• the May 9th, the Day of Europe, which commemorates the Déclaration Schuman, the May 9th 1950, regarded as the birth certificate of European construction;
• the European single currency: the Euro (€), since January 1st 1999 (materialized since 2002). Additional European characteristic: the euro is the currency of certain countries of the EU and the common currency of the Union, but not of each Member State;
• the Currency of the European Union In varietate concordia (Latin expression meaning “Plain in diversity”) proclaimed official currency the May 4th 2000 by the the European Parliament (will become the European currency only at the time of the coming into effect of the the Treaty of Rome of 2004). It was chosen by a regrouping of young Europeans.

Multilingualism

See also: Amorce=Voir articles on:, Official languages of the European Union, Languages in the European Union, Political linguistics of the European Union

From the four official languages of the beginnings of ECSC (French, German, Italian and Dutch), the European Union has from now on twenty-three official languages and three Alphabet S for twenty-seven States (list within the framework). The Irish, “first national language” of the Ireland, profited moreover between 1973 (coming into effect of the Treaty of Accession) and 2007 from a special statute (translation of the treaties and right to be used in the correspondence with the Union): it became at January 1st 2007 a working language without becoming for as much an official language.

But with each widening, the tension is strong, including out of linguistic matter, because not only of the additional difficulties of translation and interpretation but also to satisfy national susceptibilities. The Treaty of Accession of Austria (official language: German) includes/understands a list of Austrian terms thus specifically . The Croatian and, later undoubtedly, will the Serbe be treated like two languages different or a Diasystème from a common language? Languages minority but more spoken in the Union that the Maltese or Irish, feel forsaken or been unaware of (it is the case in particular Catalan, Basque, Russian of the Baltic States, Turkish spoken by the Cypriot ones, even of the Luxembourg). Ireland wishing for its part to prevent that the national language is put on the same plan as regional or minority languages, the government indicated that it could in the future claim for Irish a statute of official language, without however requiring the translation of the whole of the documents in this language (claim which will be partially reached in 2007, cf supra ). In addition, the translation in Maltais is still very incomplete in 2005 because of the enormous encountered material difficulties.

See too

Random links:

Saint-Etienne cathedral of Auxerre | Sermersheim | Gregor Fucka | Law of December 16th, 1964 relating to the mode and the distribution of water and the fight against | Dear Wendy