See also: Currency (homonymy)
Instrument of exchange replacing barter, symbol of the power of the States, major economic variable.
One of the definitions of the currency consists in saying that it is an economic good which has three functions:
The particular currency of a country is called currency.
The currency materializes for its holder the belief in an exchange value, a Crédit supposed and thus n the other hand, the potential Dette somebody or someone else (credit means confidence). The currency received at the time of an economic or commercial operation is worth only by the possibility of being accepted by a great number of users. The noble metals, the Gold, the money but also the Cuivre were used as currency for civilizations of the Antiquité. The ancient tyrants gradually seized right Battre currency - to their effigy -, and imposed them like obligatory commercial instruments dispossessing their subjects of the privilege of confidence and concentrating it between their hands.
But to be credible a currency was to have a certain exchange value or to be “guaranteed” (exactly like a guarantor or a guarantee for a loan).
That was compromised by many embezzlements (metals noninvaluable additions with gold and the money) reducing the value of the currency finally and producing Inflation. The currency then loses its value and those which hold it are ruined.
Tickets were issued which represented a gold counterpart. Because so to speak everywhere gold could be received in exchange. Only the banks (after the human cities, lords, guilds and other groups) accepted the privilege to issue tickets. Singularly, the Central bank as from the XVIIIe century in Great Britain and the Banque S in France under Napoleon were to have for each issued ticket the guarantee gold. The increase in the money supply thus allowed facilitated the economic growth. But such a monopoly government guaranteed was going to make it possible to do without the guarantee gold. Undergoing an economic crisis it was decided “to release” the currency of its guarantee gold. That made it possible the Western States to emit more currency than there did not exist of physical counterpart to this one. They mitigated the economic crisis thus by involving in debt the citizens.
In general, each Pays gives a Monopole to only one currency, controlled by a Central bank of State, although there exist exceptions. Several countries can use the same name, each one for its own currency (for example frankly French, Belgian, Swiss, CFA), several countries can use the same currency (for example the Euro) or a country can declare that the currency of another country has legal course (often the dollar). CFA franc has this of private individual whom his value is indexed on that of the French franc. Thus, 1 French franc is worth 100 CFA francs, or, being given the parity French franc - euro, 1 euro = 655,96 CFA francs.
The major monetary unit is usually subdivided in minor units. Very often, the monetary unit of subdivision has a value equal to 1/100 of the basic unit. However, certain countries have a subdivision being worth 1/10, 1/20 or even 1/1000 of the basic unit, whereas some, like the Italy before the euro or the Japan, do not have any because the value of the basic unit of their currency is too low.
Without speaking about the facial value of a currency, the question that everyone is posed when it finds one of our old currencies is, in 80% of the cases: " how much does that cost? "
It should be known that several elements enter in account:
the type. For example: 20 Cérès francs, 20 francs gold Charles X, etc It is quite simply the name of the currency.
Indeed the Roman Monnaie was initially struck in a monetary Atelier close to the temple of Junon '' Moneta '' - Junon “which informs” - the Capitole. This temple had received this nickname following the episode of geese of Capitole.
In fact, for all the great period when gold (and money) were practically universal currencies, each country even each area of a kingdom had its own money of account (sometimes based on gold, as delivers it, sometimes based on the money, like the mark), but the payments out of gold (or silver) of any source were often accepted (generally with a rebate compared to the local currency, with identical noble metal weight, and sometimes while ignoring interdicts imposed by the local lord).
Thus and for example, France of the Old Mode counted its species of books tournaments (i.e. of the area of Turns), but one paid there -- as in all Europe -- with Venetian Ducat S , French ecus, guilders (of Florence), Doubled bloom S Spanish, etc
It is only with the generalization of the fiduciary Monnaie that the money of account was essential for the other uses, since the tickets were made out directly in this money of account.
Historically (since Aristote, which, the first, gives a definition of the currency), two practices followed one another:
the first implies that the currency used has an intrinsic value ( commodity money ). In fact, the Achat with currency is then regarded only as one particular barter. Many supports were used as currency, then on the wire of the centuries of the Métaux such as the money and the Or imposed themselves, indeed they answer perfectly the criteria of Durabilité, relative scarcity and divisibility; substitutes Papier with this currency can also have course ( representative money ).
the second, which is that of the modern era (abandonment of the Gold Standard during the 20th century) but which appears very early, regards the currency as a social convention: it does not matter that it does not have any intrinsic value (the paper money is not that paper, practically unusable for another use that of currency) since everyone accepts it like currency (liking or of force…). One then speaks about fiduciary Monnaie (of fides: faith, the confidence) or of currency issued ( FIAT money ).
Paradoxically, the nature even of the currency is a question little studied by the economists, with some famous exceptions near: according to Karl Marx for example, it represents only one exchange value distinct from the value of the work which was necessary to produce a good (the difference being monopolized by the owner of the means of production). Marx devoted chapter 3 of its work the Capital to this question.
Two economists, Michel Aglietta and André Orléan, analyze them in “the violence of the currency” (1982-84) three “historical” phases in the constitution of a currency:
In fact, One can consider that the currency has an exchange value as any goods which circulate in the economic system. Best the proof being than it is subjected to the law of supply and (ex: attempts to control inflation while exploiting the interest rate of the appropriations). However, to maintain a " demande" of currency, indispensable condition of its value, it is necessary to maintain its scarcity. Indeed, in a system governed by the law of supply and demand, one sees well who if the offer increases too much, the request will decrease, being satisfied, as well as the value of the money. One can thus without fear be mistaken to say that it is necessary that there is not " not assez" of money, because if nobody asks of it, it does not have a value, in other words, it is necessary that there be poverty, which is simply taken here as equivalent of " demande" (see Friedmann).
Historically, the currency knew three functions, that here:
It is necessary to make a distinction between the currency and the other credits. Those are subjected to the risk of loss of capital or the new issue appropriateness of capital. On the contrary, the currency has a constant value in the sense that a ticket of 20 euros will be worth 20 Euro S in one year. On the other hand, the currency is not with the shelter of the losses related to inflation: a ticket of 20 € will keep the same value but its purchasing power could be modified.
The means of payment are undoubtedly the function which characterizes really the currency since, in this role, the currency has a monopoly. Legally, a debt can be extinct only by one transfer of currency. It is certainly true that other means of payment are possible, for example in kind. One still finds contracts of this type in the beams of tenant farming, however the generalization of the currency as means of payment did not make disappear the exchange from the goods the ones against the others. In fact, the currency supplanted barter for primarily technical reasons. For a total scale so that barter can function it is necessary to meet two conditions:
But the possibilities that the capacity gives “to beat currency”, in particular handling of value and implicit taxation that represents, quickly led the political authorities to reserve the monetary emission and to fight against the Faux-monnayage.
See also: monetary Creation
The Central banks emit the fiduciary Monnaie and control the currency created by the Banque S deprived in the form of Crédit. For that, they fix to them directing Taux on a sufficiently high to limit the Inflation and sufficiently low level to encourage the Investissement and the liquidity within the economy.
See also: Monetary authorities
August 1st
See also: History of the currency
Since prehistoric times, the men counted their goods. Quickly, a standard is essential in each human group: shell, minerals invaluable or useful like salt, small metal ingots (iron, then money or gold), etc
One finds of them the first traces modern in Europe at the Greek old, with the VI {{E}} century front J. - C.
Whereas the currency represents already a certain quantity of goods, that one could not handle also easily, the following stage is the installation of a currency of second level, which itself represents a great quantity of coin left in deposit in sure place. Thus the currency paper appears (the banknote, known in China as of the 8th century), which represents originally only one payable debt at sight in the form of Métal or other goods.
One can distinguish several stages in the historical evolution who led coin to the fiduciary currency that us let us know today:
the bi-metallic system (until the XIXe century): all the currencies are defined at the same time compared to gold and the money (metal). Each State, according to its metal availabilities, uses one preferentially or other metal, and makes use of the other like supplement. The money and gold coins in particular, from their intrinsic value, frequently circulate apart from their country of origin. The mining discoveries and the financial evolutions in an economy largely mondialized at the time make fluctuate the proportions between two metals, and the development of the currency paper and the credit make it possible to limit the needs for metal, and to remove money-metal like standard.
A solution (already employed) consists in fighting against the feeling of stability of the currency by the use of “melting” currency, by various means which organize a kind of Inflation forced:
See also: private Currency
The private currency is a type of Monnaie of which the emission and the guarantee rest on a private agent, in opposition to the usual currencies, subjected to a Monopole of emission and guarantee by a State or a treaty between States.
Although there were historical examples of private currencies, the private currency currently constitutes a negligible share of the money supply. The concept of private currency is primarily proposed by some liberal, like Friedrich Hayek or David Friedman, as a means to decrease the capacity of the State to handle the economy with its own advantage.
| Random links: | Éléonore d' Aragon (1333-1416) | Ferdinand Ier of Naples | Arçay (Expensive) | Face of youth (Belgium) | Kilmarnock |