Bernard-Henri Levy

Biography

From 1948 to 1968

Bernard-Henri Levy was born with Blessed-Saf in Algérie the November 5th 1948.

Its family settles with Neuilly-sur-Seine in France in 1954. His/her father, Andre, founded Becob, a company of wood African importation which was repurchased by the group Pinault-Spring-Redoute in 1997. Bernard-Henri Levy is always shareholder and administrator of several companies. He does not hide to be billionaire during the television program Free spirits on October 12th, 2007.

After studies with the college Pasteur of preparatory Neuilly-sur-Seine then two years with the Louis-the-Large College, it enters in 1968 to the National university of the street of Ulm (normal sup). He has as professors Jacques Derrida and Louis Althusser.

From 1969 to 1974

In 1971, it is received 8th with the contest of aggregation of philosophy. In September of the same year, he writes in Combat a series of article devoteds to in the French country world. The thesis of the investigation joined the problems Maoist: the Class struggle is invited in the French provinces.

In October, in answer to the call of Andre Malraux with the constitution of a “international brigade for the Bengal” the September 17th 1971, it decides to leave. Sponsored by Charles Bettelheim, professor of economy close to Louis Althusser, it travels in the Indian Sous-continent, and more especially to the Bangladesh during the war of liberation against the Pakistan. He returns in May 1972. This voyage will be the source of its first book, Bangladesh, Nationalisme in the revolution , which appears in 1973 in the collection of the Free Books of Maspero.

Of return in France, it is part-time lecturer of epistemology to the Université of Strasbourg and repeater of Philosophie to the National university.

In October 1974, it creates the collection “Figures” at Grasset, inaugurated by Jean-Paul Dollé, Access roads to the pleasure and Philippe Némo, the structural Man .

In September 1974, it has a girl of its first union with the mannequin Isabelle Doutreluigne: Justine Levy which is marries écrivaine and it Raphaël Enthoven, wire of his/her friend and editor Jean-Paul Enthoven.

From 1975 to 1980

In January 1975, it launches with Michel Butel the daily newspaper Unforeseen the which is balanced quickly by a failure.

It is chosen by François Mitterrand to belong to its group of expert until in 1976.

The June 10th 1976, the New Arts persons publishes an special issue devoted to the “new philosophers” whose Bernard-Henri Levy is editor association.

In May 1977, it publishes Cruelty with human face , at Grasset. Appearing the May 27th 1977 in the television program Apostrophes , Bernard-Henri Levy is presented there, at the sides of André Glucksmann, like a new philosopher . The topic suggested by Bernard Pivot was: “New philosophers are they of right-hand side or left? ” Invited, in addition to BHL and Glucksmann: Maurice Clavel, François Aubral and Xavier Delcourt.

In June 1979, it publishes at Grasset the Will of God . The thesis of the made book of the Monothéisme, base common to the Judaism, the Christianity and the Islam, a rampart against cruelty.

In 1980, it took part in the foundation of association “the International action against the hunger” with Marek Halter, Jacques Attali, Francoise Giroud and some others. The same year, BHL and Marek Halter create the Comité of the Human rights which militates for the boycott of the Olympic Games of Moscow. He marries Sylvie Bouscasse. This same year is born their Antonin son.

From 1981 to 1993

In January 1981 appears the French Idéologie , Grasset, coll “Figures”, in which B-H. Levy makes France retrospectively the laboratory of the European Fascisme. On a side, on behalf of certain academics recognized of the time, such Raymond Aron, Paul Thibaud, Emmanuel Roy Ladurie or Pierre Nora, the book makes the object of criticism rather severe. For example, in the Express train of the February 7th 1981, Raymond Aron will write: “ Bernard-Henri Levy violates all the rules of honest interpretation and the historical method. Here it is now the Fouquier-Tinville, him which preaches the Démocratie. He also forgets that the democracy becomes easily, she, inquisitoire, if not totalitarian. Jewish like me, it excludes from France and rejects into black France of innumerable writers or thinkers of our common fatherland. Public interest or public menace? ” Other, other thinkers, journalists and writers, such Jean-François Revel, Edwy Plenel or Philippe Sollers, always regard this work as most important, even more prophetic of Bernard-Henri Levy.

In September 1981, Bernard-Henri Levy leaves to the Pakistan with Marek Halter and Renzo Rosselini in order to give to the resistant Afghan three stations of radio transmitter, which made it possible to found “radio Kabul”, a radio of resistance to the Soviets. They were bought thanks to funds collected by the Comité of the Human rights . As opposed to what he will explain then (“a twenty year old friend”), he will not meet the commander Massoud before 1999.

In November 1984, it receives the Prix Médicis for its at the head Romance the Devil appeared at Grasset.

In March 1987, it publishes the Praise of the intellectuals , Grasset.

In November 1988, it receives the Interallié price for its novel the Last days of Baudelaire published at Grasset.

In May 1990, it launches a review which it directs entitled the Rules of the game .

In 1991, it is named President of the Commission of Advances on Receipts to the cinema (during one year).

In December 1992, France 3 diffuses One day in the death of Sarajevo , documentary realized by Bernard-Henri Levy and Alain Ferrari. Levy wishes to show the Martyr E of this city Oecuménique and the suffering of the inhabitants who resist ceaseless bombardments heroically. (War of Kosovo)

The June 19th 1993, it marries the actress Arielle Dombasle with Saint-Paul-with-Vence.

In July 1993, he becomes president of the Board of trustees of the chain Arte.

From 1994 to 2005

In May 1994, at the time of the European elections, it takes part in the constitution of the list “the Europe starts with Sarajevo” to force the political parties to take into account the situation in the Balkans. Directed by Leon Schwartzenberg, it includes/understands, in addition to Bernard-Henri Levy, Romain Goupil, Pascal Bruckner, André Glucksmann, Michel Polac, Alain Touraine… Of many personalities will support the list such: Marek Halter, Susan Sontag and Paul Auster, the South-African one, Nobel Prize of literature, Nadine Gordimer, the former mayor of Belgrade Bogdan Bogdanovic. Maintained by Leon Schwartzenberg in spite of the defection of many supports, the list obtains finally 1% of the votes cast (it had been credited a time with 12% of voting intentions).

Against the ethnic Purification with the Kosovo, it publishes in October 1994 the dangerous Purity , Grasset. Its combat for the intellectuals of Bosnia-Herzégovine will continue and lead to the publication in February 1996 of the book the Lily and Ash; Newspaper of a writer at the time of the war of Bosnia , Grasset

In 1997, it carries out with the Mexico a film of fiction, the Day and the night , with his wife Arielle Dombasle, Alain Delon and Karl Zero. Work is a critical failure and public resounding and to date remains its only attempt at “pure” cinema. In September of the same year it yields the shares that has its family in company BECOB (specialized company in the wood trade tropical) for the sum of 750 franc million, with an old friend, the industrialist François Pinault. Its current fortune is evaluated with surroundings 150 million Euros.

In 1998, it is made journalist of the civil war Algérie for the newspaper Le Monde (“the jasmine and blood”, the January 8th and “the law of the massacres”, the 9: “They prefer to pass for assassins that for the inefficient ones”.)

In 2000, it publishes the Century of Sartre with the Grasset editions.

In June 2000, it founds with Alain Finkielkraut and Benny Levy, with Jerusalem, the Institut of Studies Lévinassiennes, devoted to the thought and the work of the philosopher Emmanuel Lévinas.

In February 2002, the president of the republic Jacques Chirac and the Prime Minister Lionel Jospin entrust to Bernard-Henri Levy the mission of going in Afghanistan to contribute to the cultural rebuilding of free Afghanistan. To his return in France to spring, Levy presents his Report/ratio to the President of the Republic and to the Prime Minister on the contribution of France to the rebuilding of Afghanistan published by French documentation and Grasset, which comprises into only appendix: a speech of Bernard-Henri himself.

Does in May 2003, it publish Which killed Daniel Pearl? with the Grasset editions.

In July 2005, it takes part in the conference devoted to Jean-Paul Sartre to the international arts center of Cerisy.

From 2006 to 2007

In January 2006, it publishes in the American editions Random House its book on the the United States, American Vertigo , publication preceded by a lecture tour in this country.

In November 2006, it supports Dominique Strauss-Kahn at the time of the internal primary education of the Socialist party which must designate the candidate of the party for the presidential election. He announces to vote Ségolène Royal (finally indicated by the Socialists) as of the first tower of presidential of spring 2007 regarding it as “courageous”. He made public his choice after the remarks of the candidate of UMP Nicolas Sarkozy on the pedophilia and the suicide which he considers “unacceptable”.

In October 2007, at the time of the exit of its book on the Socialist party This large corpse with the shift (Grasset), it launched out in new attacks against Nicolas Sarkozy by fustigating her Speech of Dakar and its writer adviser of the president of the Republic Henri Guaino. “The African man, said the text, did not enter the History enough. Never he springs towards the future. In this universe where nature orders all, there is of place neither for the human adventure, nor for the idea of progress. ” “It is a racist speech” affirms T it. “BHL is a pretentious stupid jerk” retorts the adviser. This speech however obtained a positive reaction on behalf of President Sud African Thabo Mbeki. As for Jacques Julliard, leader-writer of the Nouvel Observateur, it affirmed: “I read the speech of Dakar. It is a speech deeply anti colonialist. It is not a racist speech. I owe this homage to the truth. ” ( Le Monde October 23rd, 2007). However, an open letter written by several African intellectuals denounces the paternalist and racist aspect speech of the president. The opinions more than are thus mitigated in connection with this speech.

Work

Critical of totalitarianism

Publication in 1977 of “Cruelty with human face”, test which starts strong reactions because it fraudulently registered against the theoretical reference marks which prevail on the left. It analyzes there to bring them closer, as well the effects of the Fascism as of the version Totalitaire of the Socialisme of State to try to make an assessment for the contemporary period of it. BHL, at the same time in the denunciation of the Fascism and the historical Communism, wants to be the representative of a generation come after the double catastrophe from Fascism and the Stalinisme, in order to reconsider the policy while leaving the totalitarian diagrams. By doing this it is authorized with an overhang of the history which is worth at the same time a great success to him and criticisms of many philosophers who reproach him the speed of his analyzes.

On this ground of the denunciation of the Stalinist Totalitarianism , it met André Glucksmann (author of the “Speech of the Guerre”), invested at the same moment in the denunciation of the Soviet Gulag and attached to make known the work of Alexandre Soljenitsyne (“the Gulag Archipelago”).

“The Will of God” published in 1979 prolongs “Cruelty with human face” the book analyzes the Nihilisme contemporary due to the lapse of memory of the law. He opposes to the Nihilisme, biblical wisdom where are, according to him, the richest sources of the ideas of resistance and freedom, which can be begun again for the policy today.

Analyzes French “Fascism”

In 1981 it publishes “the French Ideology”, a describing work what would be a specifically French tradition of Fascism. According to in this work of the Israeli historian Zeev Sternhell, and French historians like Henry Rousso or Pierre Milza, following the American historian to them-even Robert O. Paxton, this book is interested in the French history de la under the Régime of Vichy and of the Collaboration. Bernard-Henri Levy denounces features of one “Fascism to the Frenchwoman” who would be founded on certain preserving traditional values: values of the soil and the worship of the ground, denigration of the cosmopolitan spirit, a certain nationalism, the hatred of the ideas and intellectuals as well as the opposition to the spirit of the Lights. He recalls that Maurras, Drumont or Pierre Drieu La Rochelle also belongs to the French spirit. The description of acts of collaboration between France and the Nazi Germany - in particular via Klaus Barbie, Paul Touvier and Maurice Papon - would thus illustrate this “Fascism with the Frenchwoman”. This work was and remains discussed.

In 1987 it is “Praise of the Intellectuals” where it thinks on the role of the intellectuals of the XXe century like conscience of their time, since the Affaire Dreyfus.

International engagement

The wars and tragic events in Algeria, Bosnia-Herzégovine and with the Rwanda give place to a work “the dangerous Purity” where he sees is delirious it of purity to work in these various situations. It establishes the characteristics of the Intégrisme.

In 1989, after the Fatwa against Salman Rushdie, Bernard-Henri Levy engages in defense of the writer, of which it makes an emblem and the object of one of his engagements. In 1999 Bernard-Henri Levy publishes with Salman Rushdie “Questions of principle Six”. In 2000 it publishes “the Century of Sartre” in the heritage of which Bernard-Henri Levy is registered, for its political combats. Work which was a great success near many people not specialized. This book is, of all those of Bernard-Henri Levy, that which accepted the greatest number of praises on behalf of criticisms.

“Damnés of the war” is a test starting from reports carried out in Angola, with the Sri-Lanka, the Burundi, in Colombia, with the Sudan and published in France in Le Monde, in Italy in the Corriere beyond Will be, and in El Mundo in Spain, which gives one entitled book “Reflections on the War, the Evil and the end of the History”, 2001.

More Journaliste that Philosopher, the model whose and inspires openly Bernard-Henri Levy claims itself is that of Sartre, that is to say: the philosopher invested in the events and the fights of its time, for which the world is as well a ground of study as of intervention for philosophy. Confronting itself with the world and its becoming and fascinating party in the course of the history (“they are the men which makes the history” thesis well-known of Sartre, implying the responsibility towards the history), the philosopher, for Sartre, must know to dirty the hands (this in reference to the text of Sartre “dirty hands”). This title referred to a judgment in connection with Kant pointing the limit of the political thought of this one, namely a philosophy for a man who would not have “not hands”: man which would be neither a worker (before do not come Hegel and Marx to contradict it), nor would not be constrained to make the evil to arrive to a good - - as opposed to what Machiavel said being a need for the politician. On the other hand, on the model of Sartre, B. - H. Levy thinks that belongs to philosophy the responsibility to alert the consciences and to take the risk of the judgment in policy. The philosopher, according to Sartre, sign to be given up the Other-worldliness and any ideal of purity. Bernard-Levy with his continuation thinks, like Sartre, that philosophy is “in situation” (references to the works of Sartre “Situations I. II. III. IV”) and must open with the confrontations of the world there to take party and know to defend the causes of freedom. Heritage of a Marxist tradition, rather on the slope of Sartre, consequently.

Controversies

Reproaches of general order

Bernard-Henri Levy attracted himself severe criticisms. The principal reproaches which are made to him are several types:

the catch of freedom with the truth and the facts. It is a reproach made for example by the historian Pierre Vidal-Naquet and by Cornelius Castoriadis.
the place which it takes in the media. In particular the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu reproached him côtoyer Jean-Luc Lagardere, influential man of the world of the media and industry of the armament.
Its defense of the geopolitical interests of the the United States.
Its standpoint in favor of the movement Zionist.
Its lack of inventiveness as regards philosophical subjects.

It is shown by certain leader-writers to be a philosopher “of being expressed counter” in a rather hasty way on good number of subjects of which it does not control inevitably holding them and the outcomes, and being rather little laid out to listen to the criticism which he systematically rejects with vehemence. From where the nickname that certain satires lent to him of philosopher of thought “ready to carry”.

One also shows it not to have no attraction for the social aspect of the Socialisme, however corollary of the movement, and to prefer May 68 with the Popular front. He even acknowledges him as: “Yes, it is true, I was more interested in Bosnian misery than with misery with the corner of the street. I am a little deaf with the social question. What you want, one writes with his intelligence and his unconscious.”

It is one of the French philosophers the having been the subject of greatest number of lampoons.

It holds many pikes with Internet in the Community direction and regards the blogosphère as “planetary nombrilism”, colporteuse of gossip and not very advisable information source.

It holds a weekly Bloc-notes in the French magazine the Point and it chairs the Board of trustees of the chain Arte.

Which killed Daniel Pearl?

Criticisms

the wife of Daniel Pearl, and the other family members of this last, reproach BHL a “literary rape”, and they dispute the truth of this book. Mrs. Pearl declared on this subject that Bernard-Henri Levy is a man whose “ego destroys the intelligence”.
the specialist in the Indian Sub-continent, journalist with the Guardian and historian William Dalrymple published in diplomatic Le Monde a severe criticism of the “romanquête” on the assassination of Daniel Pearl. It shows there in particular Bernard Henri Levy to confuse certain cities, like giving an image according to him hateful of Islam. Levy obtained a right of reply, where he answers criticisms of his contradictor. In particular, it underlines to have given a rather eulogistic point of view on Islam in the final chapter of its work (ten pages). This right of reply has, in its turn, caused an answer of Dalrymple, always in the Diplomatic World.

Praises

Conversely, other readers rented the work. Edwy Plenel, then editor association of the Le Monde newspaper, differently appreciated '' Which killed Daniel Pearl? ''. Receiving on April 26th, 2003 B-H. Levy, collaborator regular of the Le Monde newspaper within the framework of his emission on the chain of information LCI, it declares: “ What does in my eyes all the force of this book: it is an investigation, they are facts. It should be read. Think against yourselves by reading this book Which killed Daniel Pearl? ”. The same day, on France Culture, Jean-Claude Casanova and Jean-Marie Colombani, accommodate Bernard-Henri Levy, and the second affirms: “ in our eyes, Jean-Claude Casanova and myself, this book is obviously very important It is a book which will remain as pilot moments of the history that we live a strong book, important. I believe that one cannot pass beside this work. ”. Knowing the polemics existing around the person of Bernard-Henri Levy, it is not perhaps pain-killer to stress that Levy and Colombani are friendly as Beau and Toscer underline it.

American Vertigo

'' American Vertigo '' of Bernard-Henri Levy, causes the controversy in literary criticisms in the United States. American journalists have chronic the contents of the book, published in English on January 24th, 2006 in the United States, several weeks before its publication in France. It is about a test of topicality on the model of the book Of the democracy in America of Alexis de Tocqueville writes following its stay in America in 1830.

“ It is a book on the United States, originally written in French (...) but who addresses itself mainly to an American audience (...) and lira the impressions from abroad on his own grounds can be irritating ”, according to the writer Brendan Bernhard. A second article of the Los Angeles Times, on January 22nd, this time under the feather of Marianne Wiggins, affirms that it has beautiful enthusiastic being on the country (it is presented as anti-anti-American) it does not seize therefore its “daily reality”. Marianne Wiggins as reproaches the book for being at the bottom sensationnalist and for missing the serious one, to be interested more in the high-speed motorboats as in the true world. “ One is far from Democracy in America, of Tocqueville, or of One the Road, of Jack Kerouac , writes it. the book of Levy has perhaps only one merit, that to make us discover how much we were blessed to have had on our premises a French who reflected on our future! Live Mister de Tocqueville! Read it, him, the original. ”

In the Wall Street Journal, Harvey Mansfield, translator of Tocqueville, writes on January 27th that it misses gratitude for the democracy in America, and delivers it same name.

the prestigious supplement literary of the NewYork Times, goes much further: “ On more than 300 pages, nobody joke, nobody seems to work, nobody does not sit down at table and seems to benefit from the meal ”, affirms there Garrison Keillor, writer who did not appreciate the reports not very representative according to him of his country chosen by Bernard-Henri Levy. He has reproached him moreover for being interested only in the stereotypes retained for 50 years by the French: streets of Las Vegas, Beverly Hills, the freak shows, the obese ones, the festival of the Iowa, (State champion of the kitsch), the Club exchanger of San Francisco where reign a transvestite who has gigantic silicone centres… “ Like always for the French writers, Levy is short on the facts and length on the conclusions”, it added before denouncing its “infantile” love for the paradoxes: America is splendid but insane, miserly but modest, drunk of materialism and nun, puritan and scandalous. The photograph of BHL however does the One, on a full page, supplement, which should bring more publicity to him for its initially drawn book to 75.000 specimens according to sources close to the edition.

the New York Magazine, under the signature of Carl Swanson, publishes a paper entitled “American psychoanalyst”, in which the intellectual is ridiculed in rockstar really not animated by the hatred of oneself, dandy baudelairien married to beautiful extraterrestrial, traversing the United States in a chauffeur-driven car (what BHL justifies by its absence of license: “an infirmity”) without thinking that which claims to want to know a country would make better rely initially to its two feet and public transport (not need for license for that). The critic notes that BHL succeeded in looking at Sharon Stone in the eyes while it uncrossed the legs, and finding a chief Indien who was anti-semite. In short, the explorer spent the good time to America: “ As good as a weekend with the hotel of the Cape ” recognizes BHL. (Source: Blog of Pierre Assouline)

Interrogé by the AFP Bernard-Henri Levy is pleased with these criticisms, including hardest, estimating that they are “the sign of a faintness” and that its goal was reached. “ That has a true direction, that wants to say well that it is a book which is made to have effects in the political debate and intellectual American ”, he declared since Chicago (northern). “ It is the book of a friend of America, which criticizes the Americans without turning the back on the great democratic vocation of America ”, he added.

Curiously, Bernard-Henri Levy is laid out to discuss with its detractors in the United States, but refuses categorically very thought contradictory or discusses in France with the authors of lampoons of which it at summer the object.

Seuls two American critics took the defense of Bernard-Henri Levy: one of the two articles is to be appeared Thursday the weekly magazine of left The New Republic, and passionately takes the defense of the author under the feather of Martin Peretz, his editor association, who estimates that Bernard-Henri Levy is “ good side of all the fundamental debates to which face the advanced companies ”. After a short appearance in the best sales, its book quickly fell with the classification.

Critical works

Lately, of many dedicated works with Bernard-Henri Levy made their appearance:

book B.A. BA of the BHL, Inquires into the largest French intellectual '', of Jade Lindgaard (journalist) and Xavier of the Door (producing) supported the idea of one supposed “mythomania” of Levy affirming that contrary to his repeated assertions, it had made only cross the commander Massoud, of which it however claimed “ to be a twenty year old friend ”. Criticisms reserved for this very polemical biography however raised its defects, its tendency to caricature (See the article: '' Mauvais lawsuit '').

the book '' BHL, a biography '' of Philippe Cohen, supports that there exist compromises with the truth on behalf of the intellectual. Cohen recalls that the philosopher Raymond Aron had said of Bernard-Henri Levy that it was “ lost for the truth ”. Bernard-Henri Levy answers these criticisms in the Express train (this interview however “was altered” by B-H. Levy)

'' a French imposture '', delivers polemic, that the journalists Nicolas Beau and Olivier Toscer devote to Bernard-Henri Levy, left.

This book, published in bookstore the February 23rd 2006, with a very polemical orientation obviously, causes strong reactions and in particular of the interested one:

“ Thanks to its relations in the media, Bernard-Henri Levy does not hesitate to correct, even to prevent the publication of articles which displease to him. This book always gives the receipts of this press attaché on the bridge, if effective for itself and its friends.

Benefitting from this media impunity, Bernard-Henri Levy allows much freedom in its “investigations” Pakistan, in Afghanistan or Algeria. This book tells its more beautiful fakings. ”

Here some passages of the book devoted to the relationship between BHL and the newspaper the Express train and especially a chronicle which reports with humor the operations of Bernard-Henri Levy against this book.

In connection with these critical works

On this subject, Josyane Savigneau, in Le Monde of the books of July 1st, 2005, devotes an article in connection with the book of Philippe Boggio, Bernard-Henri Levy, a life (the Roundtable), where it raises this strange " frénésie" who took several journalists to want to be caught some in Bernard-Henri Levy (collaborator regular World of the Books):

“ In 2004, the French edition was seized by a strange frenzy in connection with Bernard-Henri Levy. One announced five books on this intellectual " with abattre" , as a newspaper titrated it.”

“While Boggio, which wrote a serious biography, is quoted much less by the media”, notices it:

“ Boggio had from the start announced its intention to make " a true biography, with load and décharge" and not " a test approximatif". It is hardly in the air of time. As its work, serious, has it less excited the media as the two preceding tests ”.

Josyane Savigneau still specifies this:

“ It points out criticisms, the stupid ones like the prestigious ones, those of Deleuze, Vidal-Naquet and others. But also the supports, of which that of Barthes. ”

Entartages

Bernard-Henri Levy will be seven victim Entartage S in Belgium and France and will very badly take his tart with the cream received in 1985, flanking by ground No5el Godin says Gloupier, to intimate to him then: “ Rise quickly, or I crush you the mouth with blows of heel! ” . The scene, filmed, was widely diffused, in particular by Coluche and Pierre Desproges. That also was worth to him a song of Renaud, “ entarté the ” .

At the time of the Living room of the book of Paris on March 18th, 2006, Bernard-Henri Levy was entarté twice, according to the permanent Quotidien of Nouvel Obs .

Works

Bangladesh, Nationalism in the revolution , 1973.
cruelty with human face , 1977.
the will of God , 1978.
French Ideology , 1981.
devil at the head , 1984.
Praise of the intellectuals , 1988.
last days of Charles Baudelaire , 1988.
adventures of freedom , 1991.
the last judgment , 1992
men and the women , 1994.
dangerous purity , 1994.
the century of Sartre , 2000.
Reflections on the War, the Evil and the end of the History , 2002.
Which killed Daniel Pearl? , 2003.
Repetitions , 2004.
American Vertigo , 2006.
This large corpse with the shift , 2007.

See too

Random links: