Note: this article treats mainly political abstention
The abstention during a popular consultation (election or Referendum), is a practice which consists in not taking part in the exercise of the right of Suffrage whereas one is registered (or not) on the electoral rolls. The people who abstained from are called abstentionnists. The people who voted white or no one are generally not regarded as abstentionnists but the result is identical: their choice is not taken into account.
For the political elections in France, the inscription on the electoral rolls is a right and it is theoretically obligatory (L9 article of the Electoral code). It is not however envisaged any sanction for not registered people, if is not that they can neither vote, nor to take part in the public life while being presented on the electoral rolls.
With the the United States, the abstention is calculated compared to all the potential voters and not only compared to the registered voters on the electoral rolls, as it is the case in France.
One of the solutions evoked on Usenet is the negative vote. Either at the same time as a normal vote, or as a voter/indicating for that which one does not want, that which has less voice gains.
Another method is to make the vote obligatory. This solution seems effective in Belgium. It enables him to have one of the rates of abstention among low from Europe (approximately 9% for the European Élections of 2004, whereas the average of the European Union is of 44%). There is financial sanction in the event of abstention. The obligation was adopted thereafter in many countries: Luxembourg, Netherlands, Italy, Denmark, Greece, in Austria, in certain Swiss cantons, but also out of Europe: Australia, Turkey, Costa Rica, Brazil, Argentinian. The blank votes are entered and given to the party which will have had the majority, which increases its result. The obligation of the vote strongly reduces the rate of abstention, however this institution remains extremely discussed. Its opponents reproach him for not taking into account the reasons pushing the voters with the abstention. That, its partisans answer that they can make use of the blank vote and that they can register on the bulletins what they think of the parties or the personalities in place, that is done already by many people.
Other methods exist, like explaining the work of the political institutions, so as to better do to include/understand the reasons for which to vote is important, or to openly discuss points of sights which separate the various political parties. In the methods so that people get information better, the system of vote by weighting, by classification of the candidates, is often proposed, in particular the Méthode of election Condorcet.
Another method suggested would be to really give the capacity to the populations in the policy options of their life, by the means of the imperative Mandatement rather than by the majority representation (which does not give finally any capacity to the individuals, only the political intermediaries having a decision-making power, once elected). The solution with the advantage of returning the capacity to the population which can itself car-be thus determined. But in France, the mandatement imperative one is regarded as null by the Constitution of Ve République.
See also: Abstention in France
In France, the vote is obligatory only for the senatorial elections by the Great Electors (general advisers, regional, municipal, and appointed) who see themselves in the event of abstention, to impose a fine symbolic system of 4,58 €.
| Random links: | Hippodrome of Castagnolles | Symphony n° 7 of Dvořák | Armistice of Foligno | Souleymane Camara (1944) | Lucien Apple tree |